ReviewClinical & experimental ophthalmology2026
Visual Function Assessment in Geographic Atrophy: A Review.
Review in Clinical & experimental ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Geographic atrophy (GA) causes significant vision impairment and reduction in vision-related quality of life. Fundus autofluorescence (FAF) is the gold standard of structural assessment of GA but is a surrogate marker for vision loss, which can be assessed by tests of visual function and functional vision. Best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), the most commonly used visual function test in ophthalmology, is a poor metric for assessing GA progression. This is because GA usually only affects the fovea in its late stage, grows slowly, and spared areas of retina may not 'fit' larger reading chart letters, confounding measurements. For this reason, tests of visual function have been developed, including low luminance visual acuity (LLVA), reading speed, contrast sensitivity, microperimetry, flicker perimetry, and dark adaptation. Functional vision measures are approximated through patient-reported outcomes using various questionnaires. This review explores the strength of association between FAF and tests of visual function in patients with GA. A range of targeted, prespecified endpoints of visual function testing should be included in future clinical trials for treatments of GA, focusing on GA lesion phenotypes that are known to progress rapidly in order to maximise the likelihood of identifying positive results. This is critical in jurisdictions where proof of functional benefit is required for regulatory approval of treatments for GA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.