ReviewNPJ biofilms and microbiomes2025
CRISPR-engineered microbiome: living therapeutics revolutionize blood cancer immunotherapy.
Review in NPJ biofilms and microbiomes, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Targeting the Gut-Heart Axis in Atherosclerosis: Microbial Metabolites, Molecular Mechanisms, and Precision Therapeutics.Probiotics and antimicrobial proteins · 2026Review
- Dental caries beyond eradication: microbiome centered and equilibrium driven therapeutic strategies.Archives of microbiology · 2026Review
- Microbiome and cancer: mechanistic insights, diagnostic potential, and therapeutic strategies.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Microbiome dysbiosis and its modulation in cancer development, prevention and therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
- Advancements and expanding applications of CAR-T cell therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- The gut virome and regulatory T cell axis in health and systemic disease.Microbiome research reports · 2026Review
- Host-microbiome interactions in leukemia: mechanisms, treatment response, and clinical implications.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Blood cancers such as leukemia, lymphoma, and myeloma remain refractory in many patients due to immune escape, antigen heterogeneity, and therapy‑related toxicities. To address these challenges, we review recent strategies that harness CRISPR‑engineered gut commensals as precision "living therapeutics" to modulate host immunity and directly target malignant clones. We frame this review around three principal themes: (1) mechanistic strategies whereby CRISPR-engineered commensals modulate host immunity and directly antagonize malignant clones; (2) the enabling technologies and delivery/containment platforms, CRISPR variants, phage/LNP delivery, genetic circuits and biocontainment, that make living therapeutics feasible; and (3) translational progress, outstanding technical and safety barriers, and ethical/regulatory challenges that must be addressed for clinical deployment. To illustrate these themes, we discuss three concrete therapeutic modalities: engineered microbial secretion of immunomodulators, targeted delivery of tumor-lytic payloads, and engineered production of anticancer metabolites, and how these are enabled by contemporary CRISPR and synthetic-biology toolkits. Selected preclinical models report substantial antitumor effects, often >60% tumor reduction in rodent studies, and restoration of CAR-T cell function in controlled settings; however, effect sizes vary across models, and human translation remains unproven. We also analyze key technical barriers, strain stability, biocontainment, off‑target effects, and propose solutions, including auxotrophic kill-switches and AI‑guided strain optimization. Finally, we outline future directions, from in situ phage delivery to multi‑omics-driven patient stratification. CRISPR‑microbiome editing represents a paradigm shift in hematologic oncology, offering localized, sustained therapy with reduced systemic toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.