ArticleScientific reports2025
Urine color tool for coronary heart disease phenotyping.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
CHD patients often present region-specific symptom clusters, such as "upper-body heat-related" (e.g., bitter taste) or "lower-body cold-related" (e.g., cold extremities), occurring independently or concurrently. Phenotype classification relies on subjective assessment and lacks quantitative indicators. This study aimed to establish a urine color-based quantitative model for objective CHD phenotype classification. From April 2023 to January 2024, a multicenter cross-sectional study involved 200 CHD patients and 240 healthy controls. Morning urine chromaticity was quantified using CIE Lab parameters (L, a, b values). The study included correlation analysis, two-way ANOVA, and hierarchical multinomial logistic regression. CHD patients had higher rates of upper-heat (44.50% vs. 25.42%, P = 0.033) and lower-cold (60.50% vs. 20.42%, P = 0.005) clusters than controls. Upper-heat clusters negatively correlated with L (r=-0.73) and positively with a (r = 0.79)/b (r = 0.74); lower-cold clusters showed opposite correlations (L: r = 0.81; a: r=-0.77; b: r=-0.73). Two-way ANOVA confirmed independent effects (η²=0.08-0.13, P < 0.01) with no interaction. Urine color parameters explained 86.3% of phenotypic variation, with model accuracy of 85.2%. This is the first study to validate urine color quantification via CIE Lab as an objective tool for CHD phenotypic classification, offering a novel auxiliary method for precise syndrome identification and targeted interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.