ArticleHealth economics review2025
Selecting risk adjusters with penalized regression and expert judgment: evidence from Colombia.
Article in Health economics review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Risk Governance of Payment Exceptions Under China's DRG/DIP Reform: A Structured Policy-Text Analysis of Special Case Negotiation Rules.Risk management and healthcare policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Risk adjustment formulas are essential in health insurance markets, as they mitigate risk selection incentives by aligning revenues with expected healthcare expenses based on enrollee characteristics. However, current formulas can underpredict spending for certain groups, leading to under-compensation for insurers and potentially affecting fairness, quality, and access to care. Many countries are exploring the addition of new variables to improve accuracy, but this can also weaken incentives for cost control. This paper illustrates a methodology approach to risk adjuster selection by using a penalized regression framework that explicitly incorporates the potential downsides of including specific variables. Drawing on a large dataset of over 10 million Colombian health insurance enrollees, we combine statistical estimation with expert assessment of each variable's susceptibility to gaming to construct a specification that limits gaming and maintains predictive accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.