ArticleBMC health services research2025
A scoping review of virtual clinics in underserved regions: barriers and opportunities.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUniversal access to quality healthcare remains a fundamental human right; however, underserved populations in rural and remote areas face persistent barriers to timely and appropriate care. Recent advancements in digital technology, especially virtual clinics, present promising opportunities to bridge these healthcare gaps by enhancing access and continuity of care. This review aims to systematically explore the barriers and facilitators influencing the implementation of virtual clinics in underserved regions to guide future policies and strategic development.
methodsEmploying the Joanna Briggs Institute Manual for Evidence Synthesis and adhering to PRISMA-ScR guidelines, comprehensive searches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Google, and Google Scholar databases, supplemented by gray literature from targeted Google searches and snowballing techniques. A three-phase screening process was independently carried out by multiple reviewers based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data extraction and thematic analysis were conducted through a six-stage process using MAXQDA software.
resultsSixty-six articles were included from an initial 1590 records screened. The body of research has grown steadily since 2002, predominantly originating from Australia, the USA, and Canada. Major challenges identified include inadequate policy support, high startup costs, resistance from healthcare providers, limited internet infrastructure, privacy and security concerns regarding data, and restrictions in performing physical examinations remotely. Key facilitators encompass strong government policy backing, active stakeholder engagement, sustainable financial models, targeted workforce training (notably indigenous-focused), investment in infrastructure, and the adoption of hybrid care models combining in-person and virtual services. Notably, the nature and severity of these challenges and facilitators vary across countries of different income levels, underscoring the necessity of tailored, context-sensitive strategies.
conclusionImplementing virtual clinics in underserved areas faces multifaceted challenges, but strategic facilitators can significantly advance their adoption and sustainability. Context-specific approaches considering economic capacities, infrastructural strengths, and workforce readiness are essential. Strengthening infrastructure, enhancing digital literacy, supporting human resource development, and formulating enabling policies form the cornerstone for equitable and enduring virtual healthcare access in marginalized regions. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.