ArticleBMC health services research2025
Challenges in implementing pharmacist-led admission medication reconciliation in hospital practice: a qualitative study.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of Clinical Pharmacy Residents on Medication Reconciliation upon Admission in a Tertiary Care Hospital.Global journal on quality and safety in healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPharmacist-led admission medication reconciliation (MedRec) plays a critical role in optimizing pharmacotherapy during care transitions. Despite its benefits are well established, real-world implementation remains limited. To address this gap, this study explored context-specific barriers and facilitators affecting admission MedRec implementation in a hospital setting.
methodsThis narrative qualitative study used semi-structured interviews to explore factors influencing the implementation of pharmacist-led admission MedRec at a medical center in Taiwan. Fifteen pharmacists with admission MedRec experience and varying seniority levels were purposively recruited for face-to-face interviews. The interview guide was developed using the PRECEDE-PROCEED model and covered predisposing, enabling, and reinforcing factors, as well as physical and social environmental influences. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using inductive thematic analysis. Although coding was conducted inductively, the resulting themes were subsequently organized within the PRECEDE-PROCEED framework.
resultsFive overarching themes were identified. Predisposing factors reflected pharmacists' positive views of admission MedRec but noted challenges with prioritizing it in daily practice. Reinforcing factors pointed to a lack of performance feedback and limited external recognition. Enabling factors highlighted gaps in professional competencies and insufficient training opportunities. Physical and social environmental barriers, including limited information system support, frequent workflow interruptions, and unclear institutional norms, further impeded implementation.
conclusionsMajor barriers to implementing pharmacist-led admission MedRec included time constraints, unclear prioritization, and inadequate feedback mechanisms. While pharmacists recognized the value of admission MedRec, it was frequently deprioritized during routine practice. Using the PRECEDE-PROCEED model facilitated a structured assessment of individual and contextual determinants. These findings provide practical direction for developing targeted strategies to support and sustain admission MedRec implementation in hospital settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.