ArticleScientific reports2025
Interpretable wrapper-based machine learning framework for predicting patellofemoral pain syndrome using minimal clinical tests.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Clinical screening for patellofemoral pain syndrome (PFPS), a leading cause of anterior knee pain in athletes and physically active populations, often involves numerous physical tests. Such lengthy examinations are further compounded when considering the regional interdependence model. This study assessed whether near-full predictive accuracy could be achieved with a much smaller, clinician-interpretable subset of variables. We analyzed data from 70 participants with 29 biomechanical features. Nine classifiers were evaluated using stratified nested cross-validation. Eight population-based wrapper optimizers each performed ten runs of 100 iterations, and a stable subset was identified via weighted voting of feature-selection frequencies. Logistic regression, the top baseline model, was retrained on this subset. It was compared with its full-feature version using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests. Model behavior was explained with explainable AI techniques. The full-feature logistic model achieved 99.7% accuracy, and the 16-feature model maintained 97.1% accuracy (AUC = 0.998) with Holm-adjusted [Formula: see text] for all metrics, indicating no significant loss. Four mobility angles were dominant in global SHAP scores: trunk rotation, lumbar extension, hip internal rotation, and lumbar lateral flexion. The reduced test battery is expected to shorten the assessment time. These findings demonstrate that wrapper-guided feature reduction preserves predictive performance while enhancing transparency and efficiency, offering a practical, low-cost decision aid for PFPS screening and a reproducible approach to interpretable modeling in small biomechanical datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.