Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388053›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

A semi-randomised control trial assessing psychophysiological effects of breathwork and cold immersion.

Nadia Fox, Hannah Biddell, Jemma King

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Nadia FoxSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4067, Australia.
Hannah BiddellSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4067, Australia.
Jemma KingSchool of Psychology, University of Queensland, St Lucia, 4067, Australia. uqjkin17@uq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paradoxical nature of stress lies in its ability to both enhance and hinder psychological, physiological, and cognitive functioning. While chronic stress impairs functioning, acute stress can enhance resilience, cognition, and performance. We examined whether intentional short-term stress induced by cyclic hyperventilation and cold exposure (the Wim Hof Method (WHM)) improves psychophysiological and cognitive outcomes compared to an active control (mindfulness meditation). In this semi-randomised controlled trial, healthy adults (N = 404; 226 females, 177 males, 1 other; mean age = 37) completed one of three 29-day interventions: WHM in-person, WHM-remote, or meditation. Measures included physiological and sleep biometrics, executive function tests, and psychometric event sampling surveys (state and trait change). WHM conditions showed greater momentary improvements in self-reported energy, mental clarity, and ability to handle stress following daily protocol compared with meditation. Although WHM protocols initially resulted in smaller reductions in self-reported state stress, their impact increased across days on protocol, while the impact of meditation decreased. A similar time-condition interaction was also observed for energy, mental clarity, and ability to handle stress, suggesting cumulative, dose-dependent benefits. While minimal significant between-condition trait changes emerged over 29-days, state interaction patterns suggest potential for longer-term state-trait shifts. Executive function, physiological, and sleep results showed nuanced between-condition differences.

Indexed as

Cold TemperatureStress, PsychologicalAdultCognitionExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansHyperventilationMaleMeditationMiddle AgedMindfulnessSleepYoung AdultAllostatic loadCold exposureCyclic breathingExecutive functionHormesisPhysiologyStressWim Hof Method

Identifiers

PMID41388053
PMCPMC12708851

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.