Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388140›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Chemistry2026

Lessons learned in linking PROTACs from discovery to the clinic.

Andy Pike, Esther C Y Lee, Iacovos N Michaelides, Markus Schade, Ankit Sharma, James S Scott, Abhishek Srivastava

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Vepdegestrant: the first FDA-approved oral PROTAC and a milestone in targeted protein degradation.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Autophagy modulation in cancer.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andy PikeDMPK, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK. andrew.pike@astrazeneca.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6078-7501
Esther C Y LeeMedicinal Chemistry, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-0329-9186
Iacovos N MichaelidesHit Discovery, Discovery Sciences, R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Markus SchadeMedicinal Chemistry, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5538-5767
Ankit SharmaMedicinal Chemistry, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Boston, MA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4100-7722
James S ScottMedicinal Chemistry, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.
Abhishek SrivastavaDMPK, Oncology R&D, AstraZeneca, Cambridge, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted protein degradation has the potential to deliver greater efficacy than conventional receptor antagonists or enzyme inhibitors and address previously undruggable targets. This has driven a recent surge of interest in protein degradation modalities. Bifunctional degraders, specifically proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs), have become a key modality in the protein degrader space, despite the physicochemical challenges they present in achieving oral bioavailability. In this Review, we discuss the lessons learned to date in the optimization of PROTACs, with particular emphasis on the role of the linker region, including its role in optimization of pharmacology, impact on oral bioavailability, and influence on metabolic fate. The evolution from pharmacological tools to an established clinical modality, and the lessons that can be drawn from the preclinical data and the first cohort of PROTACs to reach the clinic, is discussed.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryProteolysisAnimalsBiological AvailabilityHumansProteolysis Targeting ChimeraProteolysis Targeting Chimera

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.