ArticleRespiratory research2025
Development and validation of a predictive model for postoperative acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with type A aortic dissection based on the 2023 updated definition.
Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Hospital-Acquired/Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Bridging macro bibliometrics and micro molecular mechanisms: an integrated analysis of global aortic dissection research.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a common complication after type A aortic dissection surgery and often leads to worsened clinical outcomes for patients. The early prediction of postoperative ARDS is a crucial challenge in clinical practice; however, there have been few reports on related studies based on the 2023 global new definition.
methodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 423 patients who were diagnosed with type A aortic dissection and who underwent surgery at Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital in Jiangsu Province from November 2019 to April 2025. A 7:3 random division was applied to the patients, resulting in a training set n = 296 and a validation set n = 127. Risk factors were identified via LASSO analysis, and a comprehensive risk prediction model was subsequently constructed by integrating five machine learning algorithms. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was utilised, and the model with the best predictive performance was selected based on the area under the curve (AUC).
resultsAmong the 423 included patients, 192 developed ARDS, with an incidence rate of 45.39%. LASSO analysis revealed 13 risk factors. Among the five machine learning models constructed based on these factors, the random forest model demonstrated the highest prediction efficiency for ARDS (AUC = 0.978), followed by the logistic regression (AUC = 0.965), decision tree (AUC = 0.881), support vector machine (AUC = 0.835), and K-nearest neighbour (AUC = 0.807) models.
conclusionThe development of a nomogram model using machine learning algorithms for predicting ARDS risk in patients with type A aortic dissection after surgery could identifying high-risk patients at an early stage and enable timely implementations of preventive strategies.
trial registrationThe medical research ethics committee of the Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital provided approval for this study (ethics number: 2024ky314). This study is registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry under registration number ChiCTR2500099730.The registration date was March 27,2025.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.