ArticleBMC psychology2025
Development and usability evaluation of an audio-based cognitive behavioral therapy mobile app for depression in hemodialysis patients.
Article in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionHemodialysis patients (HDPs) often experience depression, which negatively impacts their treatment adherence and quality of life. Drug therapy for depression in HDPs is often limited due to its effectiveness and drug safety concerns. Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) has emerged as a promising alternative. However, its delivery is hampered by various challenges, especially in this vulnerable population. We aimed to develop an innovative mobile application to overcome some of the challenges in delivering CBT for depression and evaluate its perceived usability among HDPs. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis study was conducted in a nephrology department in a developing country between 2022 and 2023. Relevant topics were adapted into a CBT framework tailored to hemodialysis care and cultural context by a multidisciplinary expert panel including of a senior nephrologist with decades of clinical experience and a clinical psychologist before conversion into audio format for the application. Usability was assessed with 30 hemodialysis patients aged ≥ 18 years, receiving treatment for ≥ 3 months, with mild to moderate depression (Beck Depression Inventory short form (BDI-SF) score 5–15), owning Android smartphones, and possessing basic reading and writing literacy. This study focused on the development and usability evaluation of the application; clinical effectiveness was not assessed. Perceived usability was assessed using the Questionnaire for User Interface Satisfaction (QUIS).
resultsThe hemodialysis-tailored CBT program comprised seven sessions aimed at addressing stress and depression in HDPs through skills such as goal setting, problem solving, and coping with negative emotions using language carefully developed and validated by clinical experts familiar with the needs and literacy levels of this population. The content was transformed into 26 audio episodes, each approximately 15 min long, delivered via a user-friendly mobile app featuring educational CBT content, therapist communication, peer support, and reporting functions. Thirty HDPs participated in the usability evaluation; they were primarily aged 50 to 65 years, had predominantly elementary-level education, and more than one year of hemodialysis experience. They expressed high satisfaction, with an average usability score of 7.87 out of 9.
conclusionThe application achieved high usability scores among HDPs, supporting its feasibility and perceived usability as an audio-CBT delivery platform. These findings lay the groundwork for future studies to assess its clinical efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and role in providing psychological support in real-world care settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.