Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388423›Full record

ReviewBehavioral and brain functions : BBF2025

Cognitive training shapes brain plasticity and schematic representations.

Wenqi Chen, Yan Hao

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral and brain functions : BBF, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Wenqi ChenDivision of Child Healthcare, Department of Pediatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China.
Yan HaoDivision of Child Healthcare, Department of Pediatrics, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, 430030, China. haoyaner@163.com.

Funding

Wenqi Chen 32500905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive functions are critical to everyday life, and enhancing cognitive abilities has significant implications for both individual development and societal advancement. However, there remains no consensus on whether cognitive capacities can be systematically improved through behavioral interventions, commonly known as cognitive training. Recent advancements in large-scale neural recordings offer unprecedented insights into the brain's cognitive mechanisms, presenting new opportunities to rigorously assess the effectiveness of cognitive training. In this review, we examine the core neural substrates underlying cognitive processes and explore generalized mechanisms of neuroplasticity associated with cognitive training. Integrating findings from animal models and human research, we emphasize the role of emerging schematic neural representations as potential mediators of cognitive transfer. Finally, we discuss future directions that could shed light on the mechanistic foundations of transfer after training, aiming to bridge the gap between experimental findings and real-world cognitive enhancement.

Indexed as

BrainCognitionCognitive TrainingNeuronal PlasticityAnimalsHumansTransfer, Psychology

Identifiers

PMID41388423
PMCPMC12805744

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.