Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388434›Full record

ArticleMicrobiome2025

Fetal programming by the parental microbiome of offspring behavior, and DNA methylation and gene expression within the hippocampus.

Kevin L Gustafson, Susheel Bhanu Busi, Zachary L McAdams, Rachael E McCorkle, Pavlo Khodakivskyi, Nathan J Bivens, Daniel J Davis, Murugesan Raju, Lyndon M Coghill, Elena A Goun and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbiome, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Kevin L GustafsonDepartment of Pathobiology and Integrative Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
Susheel Bhanu BusiUK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK.
Zachary L McAdamsDepartment of Pathobiology and Integrative Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
Rachael E McCorkleCollege of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Pavlo KhodakivskyiDepartment of Chemistry, College of Arts and Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Nathan J BivensUniversity of Missouri Genomics Technology Core, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Daniel J DavisDepartment of Pathobiology and Integrative Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
Murugesan RajuUniversity of Missouri Bioinformatics and Analytics Core, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Lyndon M CoghillUniversity of Missouri Bioinformatics and Analytics Core, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
Elena A GounDepartment of Chemistry, College of Arts and Science, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA.
James Amos-LandgrafDepartment of Pathobiology and Integrative Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
Craig L FranklinDepartment of Pathobiology and Integrative Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA.
Paul WilmesDepartment of Life Sciences and Medicine, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-Sur-Alzette, L-4362, Luxembourg.
Rene CorteseDepartment of Child Health & Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Women's Health, School of Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65212, USA.
Aaron C EricssonDepartment of Pathobiology and Integrative Biomedical Sciences, College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, 65201, USA. ericssona@missouri.edu.

Funding

The Mutant Mouse Resource and Research Center at the University of Missouri - ResourceU42OD010918 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI James Amos-Landgraf · 2012 to 2026
$25.1M
The influence of complex gut microbiota on central nervous system development and adult cognition and behaviorR03OD028259 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI-COLUMBIA · PI ERICSSON, AARON · 2020 to 2021
$233k
NIH HHS R03 OD028259NIH HHS U42 OD010918
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe microorganisms colonizing the gastrointestinal tract of animals, collectively referred to as the gut microbiome, affect numerous host behaviors dependent on the central nervous system (CNS). Studies comparing germ-free mice to normally colonized mice have demonstrated influences of the microbiome on anxiety-related behaviors, voluntary activity, and gene expression in the CNS. Additionally, there is epidemiologic evidence supporting an intergenerational influence of the maternal microbiome on neurodevelopment of offspring and behavior later in life. There is limited experimental evidence however directly linking the maternal microbiome to long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, or knowledge regarding mechanisms responsible for such effects.

resultsHere we show that that the maternal microbiome has a dominant influence on several offspring phenotypes including anxiety-related behavior, voluntary activity, and body weight. Adverse outcomes in offspring were associated with features of the maternal microbiome including bile salt hydrolase activity gene expression (bsh), abundance of certain bile acids, and hepatic expression of Slc10a1. In cross-foster experiments, offspring resembled their birth dam phenotypically, despite faithful colonization in the postnatal period with the surrogate dam microbiome. Genome-wide DNA methylation analysis of hippocampal DNA identified microbiome-associated differences in DNA methylation of 196 loci in total, 176 of which show conserved profiles between mother and offspring. Further, single-cell transcriptional analysis revealed accompanying differences in expression of several differentially methylated genes within certain hippocampal cell clusters, and vascular expression of genes associated with bile acid transport. Inferred cell-to-cell communication in the hippocampus based on coordinated ligand-receptor expression revealed differences in expression of neuropeptides associated with satiety.

conclusionsCollectively, these data provide proof-of-principle that the maternal gut microbiome has a dominant influence on the neurodevelopment underlying certain offspring behaviors and activities, and selectively affects genome DNA methylation and gene expression in the offspring hippocampus in conjunction with that neurodevelopment. Video Abstract.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationFetal DevelopmentGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHippocampusAnimalsAnxietyBehavior, AnimalFemaleMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPregnancyBile acidsDNA methylationFetal programmingGene expressionGut-brain axisGut microbiomeHippocampusMaternal microbiomeNeurodevelopment

Identifiers

PMID41388434
PMCPMC12699845

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.