Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41388623›Full record

Trial reportBJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology2026

Placental Growth Factor Led Management of the Small for Gestational Age Fetus: Randomised Controlled Feasibility Study.

Siân Bullough, Michelle Dower, Richard Jackson, Alexander E P Heazell, Kerry Woolfall, Lazaros Andronis, Louise Kenny, Zarko Alfirevic, Andrew Sharp, PLANES study group

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Siân BulloughHarris Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1660-5245
Michelle DowerLiverpool Women's Hospital, Liverpool, UK.
Richard JacksonDepartment of Health Data Science in the Institute of Public Health Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Alexander E P HeazellMaternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4303-7845
Kerry WoolfallDepartment of Public Health Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Lazaros AndronisCentre for Health Economics at Warwick, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Louise KennyHarris Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Zarko AlfirevicHarris Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Andrew SharpHarris Research Centre, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3396-7464
PLANES study group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo determine the feasibility of a trial investigating the optimal timing for the birth of women with a suspected late preterm and term SGA baby using either angiogenic biomarker-led care or standard care.

designA mixed methods study including a randomised feasibility trial, interviews, questionnaires and economic analysis.

settingTwo tertiary maternity hospitals in the UK. POPULATION: Women with suspected SGA pregnancies between 32

methodsWomen were randomised in a 3:1 ratio to biomarker-led care versus standard care. Biomarker tests were either revealed, with birth delayed until 40 weeks if normal (sFlt-1/PlGF < 38 pg/mL) and considered from 37 weeks if abnormal (sFlt-1/PlGF ≥ 38 pg/mL), or concealed alongside standard care.

main outcome measuresPrimary outcome was the feasibility of the study measured through the recruitment rate and adherence. Secondary outcomes were the qualitative, proof-of-concept and economic analyses.

resultsOut of 128 women invited to participate 78 women were recruited giving a recruitment rate of 60.1% (95% confidence interval 52%-69%). Sixty-seven of the 78 women consented to randomisation. Sixteen parents and 12 clinicians were interviewed. Fourty parents completed a questionnaire. Participants, partners and clinicians viewed the study as acceptable but experienced challenges in participation and delivering the study. There were no significant adverse events or differences in neonatal outcomes. Collection of health economics data was feasible.

conclusionsThe clinical, qualitative and economic results support the acceptability of utilising sFlt-1/PlGF to refine SGA management after 32

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationInfant, Small for Gestational AgePlacenta Growth FactorAdultBiomarkersFeasibility StudiesFemaleGestational AgeHumansInfant, NewbornPregnancyUnited KingdomVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1BiomarkersPGF protein, humanPlacenta Growth FactorVascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor-1angiogenicbiomarkerfeasibilityFGRlate growth restrictionmanagementPlGFrandomisedsFlt‐1SGA

Identifiers

PMID41388623
PMCPMC12884213

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.