ArticleInternational health2026
Patient-centred care measurement in sub-Saharan Africa: a scoping review of the evidence (1990-2024).
Article in International health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The aim of this scoping review was to explore how patient-centred care (PCC) is being measured in healthcare settings in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) and to examine the psychometric performance of reported measurement instruments for PCC. Medline, Web of Science, EMBASE and Global Health databases were searched for articles published from 1990 to 22 September 2024. Search was updated on 30th December 2024. The keywords 'patient-centred care', 'patient experience', 'measurement' and 'psychometric property' were used. Studies were included if they reported on the development, validation, evaluation or psychometric properties of tools used for measuring PCC. Of the 302 articles retrieved, 36, including 31 unique instruments, met the inclusion criteria. Eight instruments were locally developed in SSA. A total of 26 studies were conducted either in South Africa, Nigeria or Ethiopia. Twenty-two studies (60%) were conducted in hospital settings. Psychometric evaluation was either incomplete or not done at all. Locally developed instruments had better psychometric performance compared with instruments developed in the Global North. Although various instruments have been used to measure PCC in SSA, most of them only measure its subcomponents in specific patient populations. Comprehensive measures of PCC, developed and evaluated in SSA for psychometric properties, are needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.