ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Cognitive profiles at presentation and subsequent cognitive decline and quality of life in Parkinson's disease.
Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Cognitive profiles at presentation and subsequent cognitive decline and quality of life in Parkinson's disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionCurrently, our ability to predict cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease is limited.
methodsIn 234 dementia-free PD patients, cognitive profiles at baseline were determined using cluster analysis and longitudinal associations with global cognitive z-score, health-related quality of life (HR-QoL), caregiver burden, and risk of reliable cognitive change (RCC) were tested.
resultsParticipants fell into four cognitive profiles at baseline: normal cognition (n = 108), memory impairment (n = 47), memory and executive function impairment (n = 59), and global cognitive impairment (n = 20). After adjusting for the severity of cognitive impairment, only the memory impairment cluster showed a higher risk of RCC. Baseline cognitive profiles did not predict different rates of cognitive decline, change in HR-QoL, or caregiver burden. DISCUSSION: The memory impairment cluster showed a higher risk of developing a reliable cognitive change; however, baseline cognitive profiles did not consistently predict different rates of cognitive decline, HR-QoL, or caregiver burden. HIGHLIGHTS: Data-driven approach to identify cognitive profiles. Cognitive decline across domains assessed by risk of reliable cognitive change. Cognitive profiles did not predict rate of cognitive decline. Memory impairment profile had a higher risk of reliable cognitive change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.