Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41389117›Full record

ReviewHealth care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy2026

Transforming public mental health: a review on global trends, challenges, and pathways to change.

Olalekan John Okesanya, Tolutope Adebimpe Oso, Uthman Okikiola Adebayo, Jeremiah Ayobami Obadofin, Ridhwan Opeyemi Abdulghaniy, Adebowale Alao Bamigbade, Jerico Bautista Ogaya, Ifeanyi Ngwoke, Mohamed Mustaf Ahmed, Jomar L Aban

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Treatment Experiences of Individuals With Co-Occurring Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders and Perspectives of Mental Health Workers in Ashanti Region, Ghana.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Olalekan John OkesanyaNeuropsychiatric Hospital, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Tolutope Adebimpe OsoNeuropsychiatric Hospital, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Uthman Okikiola AdebayoNeuropsychiatric Hospital, Abeokuta, Nigeria. uthmanadebayo85@gmail.com.
Jeremiah Ayobami ObadofinUniversity of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Ridhwan Opeyemi AbdulghaniyLadoke Akintola University of Technology, Ogbomoso, Nigeria.
Adebowale Alao BamigbadeNeuropsychiatric Hospital, Abeokuta, Nigeria.
Jerico Bautista OgayaFar Eastern University, Manila, Philippines.
Ifeanyi NgwokeUniversity of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Mohamed Mustaf AhmedSIMAD University, Mogadishu, Somalia.
Jomar L AbanDon Mariano Marcos Memorial State University, Bacnotan, Philippines.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review synthesizes global trends, persistent challenges, and actionable pathways for overhauling public mental health systems, with a particular focus on low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Thematic analysis of our review revealed that mental health disorders now affect nearly one in eight people worldwide, yet up to 75% of those in LMICs receive no treatment due to stigma, underfunding, workforce shortages, and fragmented systems, perpetuating a widening "treatment and care gap." Social inequities, harmful cultural norms, conflict, climate change, and gender disparities further amplify the risk and economic burden, projected to exceed US$6 trillion by 2030. Innovative financing approaches, including public-private partnerships and models from countries such as Norway and Australia, offer promising strategies for sustainable investments. The COVID-19 pandemic intensified mental health challenges but also raised global awareness, with leaders such as the United Nations Secretary-General and the United States Surgeon General foregrounding mental health crises in the public consciousness. Advocacy initiatives, including the FundaMentalSDG campaign, Lancet Commissions, Global Mental Health Action Network, and Global Mental Health Peer Network, have been pivotal in elevating mental health within the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and linking it to social determinants. Emerging solutions include rights-based frameworks that emphasize participation and anti-discrimination, scaling up task-sharing and expanded roles for non-specialists through programs such as the World Health Organization's Mental Health Gap Action Programme, community-based interventions like Zimbabwe's Friendship Bench, and integration of mental health into primary care with dedicated counsellors, structured referral pathways, and digital innovations promising improved access and personalization. Sustained progress requires intersectoral collaboration across health, education, labor, and social sectors; embedding mental health into national health information systems; and investing in culturally adapted promotion and prevention interventions throughout the life course. Strengthening political commitment, global-local leadership, financing frameworks, and workforce capacity, particularly through continuous professional development and lived-experience participation, will accelerate progress toward the SDGs, underscoring the imperative for equitable financing and sustained political will globally.

Indexed as

Global HealthMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesPublic HealthCOVID-19Developing CountriesHumansSARS-CoV-2Community-based careDigital healthGlobal mental healthLMICsMental-health policyPublic mental healthSocial determinantsWHO frameworks

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.