ReviewPain and therapy2026
The Diagnosis and Management of Pudendal Neuralgia.
Review in Pain and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Catheter-Based Sacral Nerve Block Versus Pudendal Nerve Block in the Treatment of Pudendal Neuralgia: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial.European journal of pain (London, England) · 2026Trial
- Pudendal Nerve Entrapment Within Alcock's Canal as a Compartment-Like Syndrome: A Systematic Review.Cureus · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPudendal neuralgia (PN) is a chronic neuropathic pain syndrome affecting the pudendal nerve, often presenting with perineal or pelvic pain exacerbated by sitting. The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the existing knowledge on the diagnosis and management of PN.
methodsA PubMed database search identified 475 articles, of which 35 met the inclusion criteria. Nine studies focused on diagnostic strategies, and 26 on management.
resultsDiagnosis of PN is largely clinical, with the Nantes criteria providing a widely adopted framework. Imaging modalities such as MRI and MR neurography, along with neurophysiological tests including quantitative sensory testing, have been explored as adjuncts, though their roles remain limited. Pudendal nerve blocks are both diagnostic and therapeutic, with response rates up to 94%. Management follows a stepwise approach, beginning with conservative therapies and progressing to nerve blocks, and extending to neuromodulation or surgery when necessary. Pulsed radiofrequency and nerve stimulation techniques demonstrate promising results, with reported pain reduction in up to 95% of refractory cases, though long-term durability remains uncertain. Surgical decompression remains the most common operative option, with several techniques described.
conclusionsDespite the established recognition of PN, there is a paucity of high-quality comparative studies and randomized controlled trials assessing diagnostic accuracy and treatment efficacy. Current evidence suggests conservative measures and nerve blocks are sufficient for most patients, with stimulation techniques and decompression surgery reserved for refractory cases. Emerging modalities may offer future therapeutic options, but require validation in larger cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.