ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2026
Sodium load of novel antibiotics: considerations for nephrologists and clinicians.
Review in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundSodium restriction is a cornerstone in managing patients with chronic kidney disease. Parenteral antibiotic therapy may constitute a hidden and iatrogenic source of sodium overload, particularly relevant in hospitalized and volume-sensitive patient populations.
methodsWe conducted a structured review of the sodium content of novel antibiotics in nephrology, based on approved Summary of Product Characteristics (SmPC). Standard dosing regimens were used to estimate daily sodium burden in adult patients. Clinical implications were contextualized for patients with chronic kidney disease with or without dialysis.
resultsSubstantial variability in sodium content exists across novel antibiotics. High sodium content of > 3 g/day at standard dosages must be considered with fosfomycin and meropenem/vaborbactam. A sodium load of 1.5 g/day up to 3 g/day is associated with therapy with ceftolozane/tazobactam, cefiderocol, delafloxacin, imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam, and ceftazidime /avibactam at standard dosages utilizing sodium chloride as diluent. For the latter antibiotics, the alternative use of dextrose solutions as diluent reduces significantly the sodium load to values below 1.5 g/day. Eravacycline, lefamulin, ceftaroline fosamil, tedizolid, dalbavancin, and oritavancin itself contain an insignificant amount of sodium; only the diluent, such as sodium chloride, sodium citrate buffer, or Ringer lactate, contributes to a daily sodium load of less than 2 g/day.
conclusionParenteral antibiotics are an often-overlooked contributor to sodium intake. Clinicians should be aware of this hidden source in sodium-sensitive patients such as kidney disease patients. We propose a visual chart to support sodium-conscious antimicrobial selection as part of broader stewardship strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41389123What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.