ReviewAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2026
Advances in the application of artificial intelligence in mass spectrometry-based analysis of traditional Chinese medicine: compound identification and metabolic pathway elucidation.
Review in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Plant Flavonoid-Enriched Functional Foods for Polycystic Ovary Syndrome: Dietary Sources, Bioavailability Enhancement, and Personalized Intervention Strategies.Food science & nutrition · 2026Review
- Advances in anti-dengue virus properties of Traditional Chinese Medicines.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), characterized by its multi-component, multi-target, and multi-pathway nature, presents considerable challenges in the identification of chemical constituents and elucidation of metabolic mechanisms. TCM samples encompass a wide range of materials, including crude herbal parts, processed products, in vitro cell cultures, and in vivo biological specimens, each contributing to the complexity of analysis. MS, as a pivotal analytical tool for uncovering the material basis of TCM, has been widely employed for compound identification and in vivo metabolic pathway analysis, owing to its high throughput, sensitivity, and resolution. However, the inherently high-dimensional, noisy, and complex nature of MS data poses significant limitations to traditional analytical methods in terms of data processing efficiency and structural identification accuracy. In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) technologies, particularly machine learning (ML), and deep learning (DL) models, have demonstrated remarkable potential in spectral interpretation, structure prediction, and metabolic pathway modeling within the context of MS-based TCM research. This review systematically summarizes the latest advances in the application of AI in TCM MS analysis, with a particular focus on two key areas: the utilization of AI for rapid qualitative analysis of complex TCM compounds, including spectral preprocessing, feature extraction, structural attribution, and isomer differentiation; and the role of AI in metabolite identification and reconstruction of in vivo metabolic pathways (Alvarado, Sci Eng Ethics, 29(5):32, 2023), encompassing metabolite screening, network modeling, and multi-omics integration. Furthermore, we critically discuss current challenges impeding further progress, such as the lack of high-quality MS databases, limited interpretability of AI models, and insufficient capabilities for cross-modal data fusion. Finally, we propose future directions for the field, emphasizing the importance of building interpretable, generalizable, and integrative AI frameworks. In summary, the convergence of AI and MS technologies is reshaping the paradigm of TCM research from empirical investigation to data-driven intelligence, thereby opening new avenues for the modernization of TCM and precision pharmacological studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41389153What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.