Observational studyNaunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology2026
A 24-year pharmacovigilance study on sex differences in adverse drug reactions to antidepressant drugs.
Observational study in Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differential signal strength of male sexual dysfunction associated with antidepressants: a disproportionality analysis of FAERS database.Sexual medicine · 2026Article
- Identifying Clinical Predictors of Unfavorable Treatment Trajectories in Major Depressive Disorder: A National Multicentered Prospective Cohort Longitudinal, Naturalistic Study.Depression and anxiety · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression is more prevalent in women. Antidepressant drugs (ADDs) are often associated with an increased risk for adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Women generally appear to be at greater risk for ADRs. This observational study analyzed the incidence of ADD-related ADRs in relation to sex in 151,426 female and 92,162 male psychiatric inpatients using data from the German pharmacovigilance program "Arzneimittelsicherheit in der Psychiatrie" (AMSP) from 1993 to 2016. The type of ADR and the incidence of ADRs for different ADDs are examined. Among women and men, 0.85% and 0.67% suffered from ADD-induced ADRs (relative risk 1.25, 95% confidence interval 1.15-1.35), respectively. Women had a higher incidence of edema (f 0.055% vs m 0.009%; RR 6.31, CI 3.06-13.04), allergic cutaneous reactions (f 0.057% vs m 0.034%; RR 1.71, CI 1.13-2.57), and hyponatremia (f 0.067% vs m 0.024%; RR 2.82, CI 1.78-4.47). The incidence of sexual dysfunction was significantly higher in men (m 0.044% vs f 0.001%; RR 17.95, CI 4.39-73.48). Almost all ADD classes had a higher incidence of ADRs in women, including selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (f 0.61% vs m 0.46%; RR 1.25, CI 1.04-1.50), noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (f 0.71% vs m 0.48%; RR 1.46, CI 1.18-1.81), and tricyclic antidepressants (f 1.02% vs m 0.92%; RR 1.24, CI 1.03-1.49). These findings highlight the importance of considering sex-specific tolerability of ADDs. An understanding of these differences is a prerequisite for the individualization and optimization of patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.