Evidence mapPaperPMID 41389678Full record

ArticleInternational dental journal2026

Exploring Patient-Reported Gingival Health in Adults Using Standardised International FDI Oral Health Observatory Data.

Tom Broomhead, Jennifer Kettle, Steve Mason, Sarah Baker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International dental journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Tom BroomheadLincoln Institute for Rural and Coastal Health, University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire, UK.
Jennifer KettleSchool of Education, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Steve MasonHaleon Research & Development (formerly GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare R&D), Weybridge, UK.
Sarah BakerLincoln Institute for Rural and Coastal Health, University of Lincoln, Lincolnshire, UK. Electronic address: SBaker@lincoln.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeriodontitis is known to negatively affect oral health-related quality of life. Fewer studies have considered self-reported impacts of gingival health, despite evidence it can affect most people's daily lives. Data limitations have also meant it was previously not possible to assess self-perceived gum health internationally. This study aimed to explore differences in the associations between gum health, socio-demographics, measures of health, wellbeing and oral health-related impacts in six countries using standardised international datasets among a nonprobabilistic sample of patients attending dental services.

methodsLinked patient-reported and dentist-reported data were collected from the World Dental Federation (FDI) Oral Health Observatory. Descriptive statistics and chi-square tests were used to analyse data from China (n = 2241), Colombia (n = 1029), India (n = 999), Italy (n = 711), Japan (n = 1271) and Lebanon (n = 798). Prevalence of patients reporting spitting or seeing blood when brushing and categorical periodontal status were the dependent variables, with age, sex, education, self-rated oral and general health, wellbeing, life satisfaction and oral health-related impacts included as independent variables.

resultsSpitting or seeing blood when brushing was associated with education in five countries, while dentist-reported periodontal status worsened with age, lower education levels and among males. Worsening of both dependent variables was associated with poorer self-rated oral and general health in all countries, having a greater effect on oral health. Mixed results were seen for the association between spitting and seeing blood and wellbeing. In all countries worsening of the dependent variables was associated with life being less satisfying. Similar patterns were seen with oral health-related impacts in most cases. Country-specific patterns and variations were also detected.

conclusionThe exploratory findings can act as a basis for further research into country-specific patterns which are important for contextualising the findings, and for advocacy and understanding gingival health-related impacts and needs of patients in the countries investigated to date. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: This study found a number of associations between both patient and dentist-reported gum health and socio-demographic variables, measures of wellbeing, life satisfaction and oral health-related impacts. In particular, the importance of considering patient-reported outcomes and effects on daily life should be considered alongside clinical variables.

Indexed as

Oral HealthAdultAgedChinaColombiaEducational StatusFemaleHumansJapanMaleMiddle AgedPeriodontal IndexQuality of LifeSelf ReportYoung AdultGingivitisGlobal healthLife satisfactionPeriodontitisSocial determinants of healthWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID41389678
PMCPMC12757483

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.