ArticleAppetite2026
Functional bitter taste signaling and stimulus intensity influence diet-induced salivary protein upregulation.
Article in Appetite, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exposure to tannic acid- and quinine-containing diets upregulates subsets of salivary proteins (SPs), which in turn, results in increased acceptance of the "bitter" diet. However, it is unclear what aspects of the diet consumption influence SP upregulation. It has been thought that taste receptor activation is necessary for upregulation of SPs since sensory stimulation precedes changes in SPs, but no studies have confirmed the contribution of taste to SP upregulation. To test this hypothesis, we used TRPM5 KO and TRPM4/5 DKO mice that have impaired bitter taste signaling. These mice are able to upregulate SPs in response to isoproterenol injections but not when fed a tannic acid diet, which is both bitter and astringent. WT mice upregulate SPs after a tannic acid diet exposure while KO models do not. These data suggest that the mice are able to alter their SP expression but taste signaling is needed to upregulate SPs to diet treatments. The astringency alone from the tannic acid was not able to upregulate SPs. We then asked whether SP upregulation varies with stimulus intensity. Rats were fed quinine or sucrose octaacetate (SOA) at three different concentrations. All rats decrease intake on first day of bitter diet exposure at all three concentrations but increase acceptance of the diet by the fifth day of the quinine. In response to quinine diet, animals show concentration-dependent SP upregulation at the 14 kDa band, other bands were upregulated by diet but were not concentration-dependent. SOA did not alter protein expression at any concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.