ArticleNPJ vaccines2025
Immunogenicity and efficacy of an mRNA vaccine expressing a virus-like particle spike antigen against SARS-CoV-2.
Article in NPJ vaccines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immunogenicity and Protection of mRNA Vaccine Encoding Spike Protein of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron-XEC Subvariant.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Engineering strategies and decision frameworks for virus-like particle-based vaccines against infectious diseases.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic spurred mRNA vaccine innovation, but new SARS-CoV-2 variants highlight the need for vaccines with improved potency and durability. This report presents a novel mRNA vaccine platform encoding virus-like particle antigens (mRNA-VLPs) that mimic native virus structures, aiming to boost antibody responses via enhanced B cell activation. In animal studies, mRNA-VLP vaccines generated stronger neutralizing antibody responses across multiple variants compared to conventional mRNA vaccines expressing native spike proteins. In non-human primates, these elevated antibodies lasted at least six months. An mRNA-VLP vaccine encoding the Omicron spike outperformed traditional mRNA vaccines in mice as both a monovalent and bivalent (with ancestral spike) formulation. In hamsters, even low doses of mRNA-VLP vaccine provided complete protection, similar to high doses of native spike mRNA vaccines. These results suggest the mRNA-VLP platform could significantly strengthen vaccine efficacy and breadth against evolving SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.