Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390354›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Dynamic nanoscale architecture of synaptic vesicle fusion in mouse hippocampal neurons.

Jana Kroll, Uljana Kravčenko, Mohsen Sadeghi, Christoph A Diebolder, Lia Ivanov, Małgorzata Lubas, Thiemo Sprink, Magdalena Schacherl, Mikhail Kudryashev, Christian Rosenmund

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Jana KrollCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Neurophysiology, Berlin, Germany. jana.kroll@mdc-berlin.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4243-4088
Uljana KravčenkoMax Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, In Situ Structural Biology, Berlin, Germany.
Mohsen SadeghiFreie Universität Berlin, Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7698-5630
Christoph A DiebolderMax Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Technology Platform Cryo-EM, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7694-7362
Lia IvanovCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Neurophysiology, Berlin, Germany.
Małgorzata LubasCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Neurophysiology, Berlin, Germany.
Thiemo SprinkMax Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Technology Platform Cryo-EM, Berlin, Germany.
Magdalena SchacherlCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5478-2509
Mikhail KudryashevMax Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, In Situ Structural Biology, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3550-6274
Christian RosenmundCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Neurophysiology, Berlin, Germany. christian.rosenmund@charite.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3905-2444

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 384148553Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 384149399Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 399894546Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 436260754Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 447835500Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 458275811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Synaptic vesicle (SV) fusion is not only tightly coordinated but also happens at a millisecond timescale. Competing models for fusion initiation and propagation suggest tight docking and hemifusion of SVs or localized lipid rearrangements leading to tip-like membrane contacts. Yet, a direct nanoscale examination of the full SV fusion sequence has been lacking. Here, we establish a workflow for timed in situ cryo-electron tomography of optogenetically stimulated mouse neurons to capture the complete SV fusion sequence - from SV recruitment to fusion pore formation, opening and collapse - with near-native structural preservation. Notably, tethered SVs directly undergo fusion initiation via stalk formation, without preceding tight docking or SV flattening. The plasma membrane forms a minimal dimple during fusion initiation, contradicting preceding models that invoke strong membrane bending prior to fusion. In addition, we observe filaments linking fusing SVs to adjacent SVs, indicating a physical link between fusion and SV resupply.

Indexed as

HippocampusMembrane FusionNeuronsSynaptic VesiclesAnimalsCell MembraneCryoelectron MicroscopyMiceOptogenetics

Identifiers

PMID41390354
PMCPMC12706093

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.