ArticleNature communications2025
Circadian rhythm profiles derived from accelerometer measures of the sleep-wake cycle in two cohort studies.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Accelerometer-derived 'weekend warrior' physical activity pattern and sleep.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Exercise modulates redox homeostasis in cardiovascular and metabolic diseases: from bench to clinic.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2026Review
- Circadian rhythm profiles derived from accelerometer measures of the sleep-wake cycle in two cohort studies.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Accelerometers allow objective measures of dimensions (rest-activity rhythm (RAR), daytime activity, sleep, and chronotype) of the bio-behavioural manifestation of circadian rhythm (CR) using multiple metrics in large-scale studies. These dimensions are rarely examined together due to methodological challenges of using correlated data. To address this challenge, we propose a two-step approach consisting of data reduction of CR metrics using principal component analyses, followed by k-means clustering to identify groups of individuals with a similar profile using data from the Whitehall II (N = 3,991, mean age=69.4years) and UK Biobank (N = 54,995, mean age=67.5years) cohort studies. Our analyses identified nine CR clusters: two presented extreme (most robust/poorest) RAR and (highest/lowest) daytime activity, two robust RAR with opposite sleep profiles (longer and efficient/shorter and fragmented), one high-intensity physical activity, and four poor RAR (one characterised by late chronotype, two by low activity but opposite sleep profiles, and one by restless (agitated) sleep). The participants in these nine clusters differed on sociodemographic, behavioural and health-related factors. Findings were similar in these two independent cohort studies, highlighting the validity of our approach. Most previous studies have used only the RAR dimension of circadian rhythm, and here we show that this might be an oversimplification as demonstrated by nine clusters characterised by combinations of RAR, daytime activity, sleep, and chronotype. Our innovative approach demonstrates feasibility of using all dimensions to study the impact of circadian rhythm dysregulation on health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.