ArticleBMC health services research2025
Distress financing on inpatient health expenditure across States in India.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Impact of out-of-pocket health expenditure on poverty in India.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOut-of-pocket (OOP) healthcare expenditures remain a significant burden and are a leading cause of distress financing, particularly among socioeconomically disadvantaged households in India. Despite recent reductions in OOP spending, many families continue to experience financial hardship when seeking inpatient care. The study aims to examine state-level disparities and key socioeconomic determinants influencing reliance on distress financing as a coping strategy.
methodsData from the 75th round (2017-18) National Sample Survey Organization (NSSO), covering 113,823 Indian households, were analyzed. Distress financing was defined as any non-income/savings method used to pay for inpatient care. Logistic regression was conducted to identify key socio-economic and health-related determinants at national and state levels.
resultsScheduled Castes (SC) and Scheduled Tribes (ST), as well as households with lower income and education levels, exhibited significantly higher reliance on distress financing. States such as Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Maharashtra, and Rajasthan demonstrated the greatest incidence of distress financing, particularly in rural areas. Even among insured households, distress financing persisted, especially in rural settings. Regression analysis identified social group, income quintile, education, occupation, household size, and health insurance coverage as significant predictors of distress financing.
conclusionsDistress financing for inpatient healthcare persists as a major challenge in India, despite a downward trend in OOP expenses. The burden is disproportionately higher among vulnerable groups and in states with weaker public healthcare systems. Policymakers should prioritize targeted insurance coverage, health infrastructure strengthening, and need-based financial protection for high-risk groups to reduce the incidence of distress financing and increase equity in healthcare access.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.