Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41390665›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Environmental exposures associated with the gut microbiome and resistome of pregnant women and children in Northwest Ecuador.

Irmarie Cotto, Viviana Albán, Ana Durán-Viseras, Kelsey J Jesser, Nicolette A Zhou, Caitlin Hemlock, April M Ballard, Christine S Fagnant-Sperati, Gwenyth O Lee, Janet K Hatt and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Irmarie CottoDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1626-1630
Viviana Albán *Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7519-6683
Ana Durán-Viseras *School of Civil and Environmental Engineering and School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2369-3535
Kelsey J JesserDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Nicolette A ZhouDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
Caitlin HemlockDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.
April M BallardDepartment of Population Health Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3839-5637
Christine S Fagnant-SperatiDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9794-307X
Gwenyth O LeeRutgers Global Health Institute, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.
Janet K HattSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering and School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5666-0994
Charlotte J RoyerSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering and School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Joseph N S EisenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Gabriel TruebaInstituto de Microbiología, Colegio de Ciencias Biologicas y Ambientales, Universidad San Francisco de Quito, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID 0000-0003-2617-9021
Konstantinos T KonstantinidisSchool of Civil and Environmental Engineering and School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
Karen LevyDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. klevyx@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0002-0968-9401
Erica R FuhrmeisterDepartment of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. efuhrm@uw.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-5264-7533
ECoMiD Authorship Group

Funding

XENOBIOTIC BIOTRANSFORMATION AND DISPOSITIONP30ES007033 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI Sheela Sathyanarayana · 1995 to 2026
$42.5M
Gut microbiome, enteric infections and child growth across a rurual urban gradientR01AI137679 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI EISENBERG, JOSEPH N. S., LEVY, KAREN · 2018 to 2023
$5.3M
Enteric Pathogen Force of Infection among Children using SerologyR01AI162867 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI ARNOLD, BENJAMIN F · 2021 to 2025
$3.7M
American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) 2127509NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI137679NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI162867NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES007033University of Washington Interdisciplinary Center for Exposures, Diseases, Genomics & EnvironmentU.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (NIH) R01AI162867
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inadequate water, sanitation, and hygiene (WASH) infrastructure may increase exposure to antimicrobial resistance (AMR). In addition, close human-animal interactions and unregulated antibiotic use in livestock facilitate the spread of resistant bacteria. We use metagenomic sequence data and multivariate models to assess how animal exposure and WASH conditions affect the gut resistome and microbiome in 53 pregnant women and 84 children in Ecuador. Here we show improving WASH infrastructure and managing animal exposure may be important in reducing AMR but could also reduce taxonomic diversity in the gut. Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, and clinically relevant antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) are detected across all age groups, but the highest abundance is found in children compared to mothers. In mothers, higher animal exposure trends towards a higher number of unique ARGs compared to low animal exposure and is significantly associated with greater taxonomic diversity. In addition, mothers with sewer systems or septic tanks and piped drinking water have fewer unique ARGs compared to those without, and mothers with longer duration of drinking water access have lower total ARG abundance. In contrast, few associations are observed in children, likely due to the dynamic nature of the gut microbiome during early childhood.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialEnvironmental ExposureGastrointestinal MicrobiomeAdolescentAdultAnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaChildChild, PreschoolEcuadorEscherichia coliFecesFemaleHumansHygieneAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID41390665
PMCPMC12764814

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.