ArticleChembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology2026
Computational Analysis Uncovering Contrasts in G-Quadruplex Propensity and Aptamer Enrichment in SELEX-Derived Libraries.
Article in Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computational Analysis Uncovering Contrasts in G-Quadruplex Propensity and Aptamer Enrichment in SELEX-Derived Libraries.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
G-quadruplexes (G4s) are noncanonical nucleic acid structures with biological and therapeutic significance, and they are found in many aptamer sequences. Using c-kit 1 G4 DNA as a target, systematic evolution of ligands by exponential enrichment (SELEX) has been carried out using an RNA library, resulting in G4-rich aptamers. Herein, this article investigates the relationship between predicted G4-forming potential and aptamer enrichment by analyzing high-throughput SELEX libraries using three G4 prediction tools: G4NN, G4Hunter, and QGRS Mapper. While the tools demonstrate strong internal consistency and overlap in identifying G4-prone sequences, their predictions show limited concordance with experimental abundance and enrichment trends across SELEX rounds. Only a small fraction of sequences display both high G4 scores and consistent enrichment. Experimental validation using electrophoretic mobility shift assays confirmed that strong predicted G4-forming sequences often lack strong binding activity, whereas highly enriched aptamers with strong binding activities may show weaker G4 signatures computationally. These findings suggest that current G4-prediction tools alone are insufficient for aptamer candidate selection and highlight the need for integrative evaluation strategies that combine structural prediction with empirical performance data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.