ArticleFrontiers in medicine2025
Establishing a nomogram on the risk of pathological escalation of intestinal intraepithelial neoplasia in patients with colorectal intraepithelial neoplasia: a retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a predictive model for pathological upgrading in colorectal polyps based on endoscopic forceps biopsy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: To develop and validate a predictive model estimating the likelihood of pathological upgrading in patients with colorectal intraepithelial neoplasia (IN). Methods: Using data from 158 patients with colorectal IN confirmed by endoscopic biopsy, we employed Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression followed by multivariate logistic regression to identify key predictive factors. A nomogram was constructed based on the selected variables. The performance of these models was assessed using calibration curves, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test. Furthermore, decision curve analysis (DCA) was utilized to evaluate the practical utility of the models, thereby exploring their potential clinical applications. Results: Four variables-rectal location, surface erosion, lesion size ≥ 30 mm, and villous histology-were incorporated into the nomogram. The model demonstrated strong discrimination (AUC = 0.822; 95% CI: 0.744-0.899) and good calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow χ Conclusion: This nomogram accurately predicts pathological upgrading in colorectal IN, allowing clinicians to identify high-risk patients early and tailor management accordingly.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.