ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025
Application of machine learning to predict the occurrence of venous thromboembolism in patients hospitalized for coronary artery disease: a single-center retrospective study.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Contemporary Challenges in Venous Thromboembolism: Evolving Populations and Implications for Management and Risk Stratification.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This study aimed to construct a prediction model for the occurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients hospitalized with coronary heart disease (CHD) using machine learning algorithms. Methods: Clinical data were from the medical records of CHD patients admitted to tertiary hospitals in eastern Liaoning Province between 2019 and 2024. Five machine learning algorithms-random forest (RF), classification and regression tree (CART), logistic regression (LR), logistic regression + least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LR + LASSO), and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost)-were used to construct predictive models. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy were comparison metrics between different models. Results: A total of 3113 CHD inpatients were included in the study. In the internal validation set, XGBoost had the highest AUC (0.704), sensitivity (0.708), and accuracy (0.692), and RF had the highest specificity (0.706). In the time external validation set, LR + LASSO had the highest AUC (0.649), the highest specificity (0.683) for RF, and the highest sensitivity (0.682) and accuracy (0.656) for XGBoost. D-dimer, Age, and Neutrophil Count (NEUT) were the three most important relevant indicators. Conclusion: The prediction model based on machine learning algorithms for the occurrence of VTE in CHD inpatients has a specific diagnostic value. The prediction model constructed by LR + LASSO and XGBoost is more effective than the models constructed by other methods. The results of this study can provide research ideas for the clinical prevention and treatment of VTE events occurring in CHD inpatients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.