Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393266›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2025

Clinical study on postoperative inflammation and cardiac function improvement following valve replacement surgery.

Xuelian Li, Maosen Xu, Chen He, Shengwu Chao, Rong Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Xuelian Li *Department of Cardiology, Yancheng No.1 People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China.
Maosen Xu *Department of Cardiology, Yancheng No.1 People's Hospital, Yancheng, Jiangsu, China.
Chen HeZhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shengwu ChaoNavy 905 Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Rong ZhouNavy 905 Hospital, Shanghai, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the impact of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels measured on the third day after valve replacement surgery on cardiac function recovery at 3 months postoperatively and to analyze its association with other clinical risk factors, thereby providing reference data for perioperative management. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 188 patients who underwent valve replacement surgery. Based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria, using a postoperative CRP level of 150 mg/L as the grouping standard. Patients were divided into a high-inflammation group (100 cases) and a low-inflammation group (88 cases) based on CRP levels on postoperative day 3. Baseline characteristics, preoperative BNP levels, LVEF, intraoperative parameters, postoperative inflammation levels, and complications were compared between the two groups. Postoperative LVEF, BNP levels at 1 week and 3 months, and total hospital stay were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify factors influencing cardiac function improvement at 3 months in the high inflammation group. Data were analyzed using SPSS, with a Results: The high inflammation group showed a lower cardiac function improvement rate at 3 months (71% vs. 85.2%, Conclusion: Elevated CRP levels on the third day after valve replacement surgery significantly impact cardiac function recovery and prolong hospital stay. Moreover, advanced age and lower preoperative LVEF are independent risk factors for poor cardiac function recovery.

Indexed as

cardiac function recoveryC-reactive proteinpostoperative inflammationrisk factorsvalve replacement surgery

Identifiers

PMID41393266
PMCPMC12695778

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.