ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2025
Beyond glycemic control: a holistic perspective on psychosocial support in outpatient diabetes management.
Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Supporting change in a complex reality: a qualitative study of specialist nurses' perceptions of counselling patients at risk of type 2 diabetes.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2026Article
- What Is a Clinically Meaningful Change in Diabetes Distress? Findings for Diabetes Care and Research From the SFDT1 Cohort.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Conventional outpatient diabetes management, which focuses mainly on biomedical measures like glycemic control, may be inadequate for achieving sustainable long-term health outcomes, especially among patients with co-occurring psychosocial challenges. Although these methods are physiologically important, they often ignore key psychosocial factors that greatly affect self-management, treatment adherence, and clinical results. Based on the biopsychosocial model, this article proposes a comprehensive care framework that includes structured psychosocial support as a core part of diabetes management. Strong evidence shows that psychosocial factors-such as diabetes-related distress, mental health conditions, and social determinants-directly influence glycemic control, quality of life, and complication rates. The article also points out structural weaknesses in current healthcare systems that prevent integrated care. In response, a coordinated, multi-level strategy is introduced. This includes systematic psychosocial screening, communication methods supported by evidence, digital health technologies, and personalized stepped-care interventions. Finally, we recommend systemic reforms in clinical practice, payment policies, and medical education to support a shift toward person-centered, biopsychosocial diabetes care. These changes are necessary to address the complex nature of diabetes and improve both health outcomes and patient well-being.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.