ReviewCureus2025
Bibliometric Analysis of Vitamin D Research 2019-2024.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vitamin D research is an important area of biomedical research. This study is a bibliometric analysis that investigated trends in vitamin D research since 2019. A bibliometric analysis was conducted using the SCOPUS database for data extraction. A total of 10,449 articles (2019-2024) were analyzed using the Biblioshiny package in RStudio. Articles were included if they contained "Vitamin D" in titles, abstracts, and keywords. The highest scientific production on vitamin D was observed in the USA (5,354), followed by China (4,842), which showed a steep increase in research output over time. Both had more single-country than multi-country publications, with international co-authorship at 21.02% of publications. Between the peak in 2021 (1,895 articles) and the low in 2024 (1,584 articles), vitamin D research output declined by 16.52%; citation rates also decreased. The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.