ArticleCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada2025
Does influenza vaccination contribute to the prevention of cardiovascular events? An umbrella review.
Article in Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Guideline
- Management of brain-heart multimorbidity: a clinical practice guideline.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026Guideline
- Does influenza vaccination protect people with breakthrough infections from acute cardiovascular events?Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026Article
- Summary of the National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Statement for 2025-2026.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There is a growing body of evidence on the potential benefit of influenza vaccination against the occurrence of cardiovascular (CV) events. Objective: This umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (SRMAs) aims to summarize the available evidence on the risk of CV events in adults after receipt of influenza vaccine. Methods: Four electronic databases were searched (CINAHL, PubMed, SYSVAC and Cochrane Library) for SRMAs published in English or French, between January 1, 2000, and January 14, 2025. Eligible SRMAs included those with a quantitative synthesis of data examining the association between influenza vaccination and the risk of CV events in adults. Data from the included SRMAs were extracted using predefined variables. The quality of each SRMA was assessed by two independent reviewers using the AMSTAR 2 tool. Results: The review included 25 SRMAs published between 2012 and 2024. Overall, 15 SRMAs were deemed to be of moderate or high quality and were further considered in the evidence synthesis. The most frequently evaluated clinical outcomes were myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause and CV mortality, and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). In vaccinated individuals at high-risk for CV events, the risk of CV death was significantly reduced by 23% to 47%, MACE by 26% to 37%, MI by 29% to 34%, and stroke by 13% to 19% compared to unvaccinated individuals. Conclusion: High-quality evidence from the existing literature supports influenza vaccination as an effective preventive measure for reducing CV disease burden. Highlighting this benefit to patients could increase vaccine uptake and improve both influenza and CV outcomes, especially where coverage remains suboptimal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.