Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41393804›Full record

ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2025

Arthroscopic Bankart Repair Provides Satisfactory Outcomes for Both Central-Track and Peripheral-Track Lesions in Noncontact Athletes With a Minimum 8-Year Follow-up.

Muhammed Furkan Tosun, Ethem Burak Oklaz, Ahmet Emin Okutan, Furkan Aral, Toygun Kagan Eren, Seda Nur Tosun, Elif Banu Guler Oklaz, Ulunay Kanatli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Muhammed Furkan TosunDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Yenimahalle Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9085-7136
Ethem Burak OklazDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6241-8523
Ahmet Emin OkutanDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Samsun, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1818-9422
Furkan AralDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4879-6530
Toygun Kagan ErenDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4526-4216
Seda Nur TosunDepartment of Radiology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0569-1480
Elif Banu Guler OklazDepartment of Radiology, Bilkent City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey.
Ulunay KanatliDepartment of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Gazi University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9807-9305

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In recent years, on-track lesions have been subclassified as peripheral- and central-track lesions based on the Hill-Sachs lesion occupancy within the glenoid track. Studies have stated that arthroscopic Bankart repair can be performed in noncontact athletes with on-track lesions, regardless of whether they are classified as peripheral or central track. However, this assumption currently remains theoretical and requires confirmation or refutation through clinical follow-up studies. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of peripheral- and central-track lesions on long-term clinical outcomes in a homogeneous cohort of noncontact athletes undergoing arthroscopic Bankart repair. It was hypothesized that arthroscopic Bankart repair provides satisfactory long-term outcomes for both central-track and peripheral-track lesions in noncontact athletes. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Patients who underwent arthroscopic Bankart repair for shoulder instability from 2013 to 2017 were retrospectively evaluated. Patients with a glenoid defect <25%, on-track lesions, and participation in noncontact sports were included in the study. Patients were classified as having peripheral-track lesions (lesion in the medial one-fourth of the glenoid track) and central-track lesions (lesion in the lateral three-fourths of the glenoid track). The 2 groups were compared in terms of demographic characteristics, redislocation rates, return to sports, and patient-reported outcome measures, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index, and visual analog scale scoring systems. Results: The study included 101 patients: 62 with central-track lesions (mean ± SD; age, 26.6 ± 8.7 years; follow-up, 9.1 ± 1.2 years) and 39 with peripheral-track lesions (mean ± SD; age, 25.9 ± 6.9 years; follow-up, 8.8 ± 1.2 years). At the final follow-up, no significant differences were observed between the 2 groups for Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index ( Conclusion: In patients with shoulder instability who participate in noncontact sports and have on-track lesions, arthroscopic Bankart repair provides satisfactory long-term clinical outcomes regardless of whether the lesion is classified as peripheral track or central track.

Indexed as

central tracknoncontact athletesperipheral trackshoulder instability

Identifiers

PMID41393804
PMCPMC12701258

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.