ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2026
Evaluation of 17β-Estradiol Administration by Subcutaneous Injections in Transgender Women.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Context: 17β-Estradiol (E2) is increasingly administered subcutaneously (SC) to transgender women, but questions remain regarding dosing and efficacy. Objectives: The primary aims of this work were to determine if SC E2 could consistently achieve serum E2 and total testosterone (TT) levels within target therapeutic ranges and if TT and E2 levels were comparable to those achieved with standard oral therapy. The secondary aim was to determine if serum estrone (E1) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) levels were lower with SC compared to oral administration, possibly reflecting fewer first-pass hepatic effects. Methods: This retrospective cohort study evaluated records of transgender women receiving either SC or oral E2 in the Reproductive Endocrinology and Gender Clinics at Maine Medical Center. Serum levels of E2, TT, E1, and SHBG were extracted from charts. Results: Demographics were similar in SC (n = 25) and oral (n = 20) groups. Serum E2 reached the target therapeutic range (75-250 pg/mL) and TT was suppressed to less than 50 ng/mL in all patients and were not statistically different between groups. In 5 patients in the SC group, E2 was measured before and after dosing, with mean values within the target range. The median (interquartile range) E1 level was higher in the oral E2 group than in the SC E2 group (907 pg/mL [737-1576 pg/mL] and 76 pg/mL [49-96 pg/mL]; Conclusion: SC E2 administration is effective in transgender women for achieving target serum E2 and TT levels. Both SC and orally administered E2 achieved similar E2 and TT levels, but orally administered E2 resulted in much higher E1 levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.