ArticleFrontiers in pharmacology2025
Real-world pharmacovigilance insights into drug-induced risk of alopecia.
Article in Frontiers in pharmacology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Alopecia is a significant adverse effect that profoundly impacts quality of life. Although numerous medications are implicated, the real-world risk profiles across drug classes and patient demographics remain poorly quantified. Objective: To identify and characterize drugs associated with alopecia using real-world data from the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Methods: FAERS reports from Q1 2004 to Q4 2024 were analyzed using four disproportionality methods (ROR, PRR, BCPNN, MGPS) to detect signals of drug-alopecia associations. Subgroup analyses were conducted by age, gender, and drug category. Time-to-onset (TTO) was analyzed using the Weibull distribution model. Results: A total of 181,838 reports with drug-associated alopecia were identified. The mean age was 53.84 ± 16.28 years, and 76.82% of reports were from females. Oncology medications showed strongest association (37.5%), especially docetaxel (ROR = 70.38). Endocrine (18.8%) and immune system medications (10.9%) were also prominent. The TTO analysis revealed a bimodal distribution, with 40.2% of cases occurring within 30 days and 13.1% manifesting at 240-360 days. Males experienced a significantly shorter onset latency compared to females (108 days vs. 236 days, Conclusion: This large-scale pharmacovigilance study identified 64 drugs with significant alopecia signals, highlighting distinct demographic patterns and latency periods. The findings underscore the need for heightened clinical vigilance, gender-specific monitoring, and updates to labels to better reflect real-world risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.