Evidence mapPaperPMID 41394291Full record

SynthesisBioMed research international2025

Revolutionizing Lung Cancer Detection: A High-Accuracy Machine Learning Framework for Early Diagnosis.

Tahir Muhammad Ali, Azka Mir, Attique Ur Rehman, Mamoona Humayun, Momina Shaheen, Rafeef Taresh Suliman Alshammari

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BioMed research international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Tahir Muhammad AliDepartment of Computer Science, Gulf University for Sciences and Technology, Mubarak Al-Abdullah, Kuwait.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4970-9948
Azka MirDepartment of Software Engineering, University of Sialkot, Sialkot, Pakistan, uskt.edu.pk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1733-3242
Attique Ur RehmanDepartment of Computer Science, Gulf University for Sciences and Technology, Mubarak Al-Abdullah, Kuwait.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7416-6973
Mamoona HumayunDepartment of Computing, School of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK, roehampton.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6339-2257
Momina ShaheenDepartment of Computing, School of Arts Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Roehampton, London, UK, roehampton.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9424-9787
Rafeef Taresh Suliman AlshammariDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer and Information Sciences, Jouf University, Sakakah, Al Jouf, Saudi Arabia, ju.edu.sa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-3949-1839

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer is a deadly disease. According to a report of 2024, it is the primary reason for 1.82 million deaths. Given the high disease burden, early detection of lung cancer is crucial for improving survival rates and implementing effective strategies. This paper is aimed at conducting a systematic literature review and developing a highly accurate framework for predicting lung cancer effectively. Tollgate methodology has been used for systematic literature review, and quality assessment criteria were applied to select published articles relevant to the research questions. The paper investigates the effectiveness of machine learning in identifying patterns relevant to lung cancer prediction (Q1), examines the pros and cons of current predictive systems (Q2), compares the use of artificial intelligence in lung cancer prediction with traditional methods (Q3), and identifies key features that distinguish lung cancer from patient symptoms (Q4). Machine learning techniques were employed for the proposed framework. Two publicly available, distinct datasets containing clinical features were obtained. Then, the SelectKBest method was used for feature selection, and SMOTE was used to handle class imbalance. Our proposed framework includes a voting ensemble with random forest, support vector machine, and logistic regression with cross-validation. The results indicate an accuracy of 99% and 92.5% for the first and second datasets, respectively. This study's systematic literature review, based on four research questions and a machine learning model, exhibits high accuracy in predicting lung cancer.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningHumansSupport Vector Machineclassificationliterature synthesislung cancermachine learningprediction modelsystematic analysis

Identifiers

PMID41394291
PMCPMC12699974

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.