ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Radiomics-Based Machine Learning in the Diagnosis of Type-B Aortic Dissection on Computed Tomography Images.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the value of a radiomics-based machine learning model in detecting Type-B aortic dissection (TBAD) on computed tomography (CT) images. Methodology: This retrospective analysis included one hundred records of patients with clinically diagnosed TBAD and one hundred records of non-TBAD patients treated at the First Hospital of Jiaxing from January 2010 to January 2024. Radiomics features were extracted from CT non-contrast images, and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) was used to construct dimensionality reduction and prediction models. The diagnostic performance of the model was evaluated through receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. Results: Fifteen radiomics features were extracted from the training cohort. All eight machine learning-established radiomics models in the training cohort demonstrated good prediction accuracy, with area under the ROC curve (AUC) values exceeding 0.9 in the validation set. Among the three models compared, the AUC values of the nomogram were the highest in both the training and validation cohorts (0.991 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.982-1.000] and 0.998 [95% CI: 0.993-1.000], respectively). The calibration curves of the nomogram in both cohorts were more closely aligned with the dashed line. The nomogram showed the highest clinical benefits in both training and validation cohorts. Conclusions: The predictive model established based on radiomics analysis of CT images demonstrates good predictive ability in recognizing TBAD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.