ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
A Simple Osteoporosis Clinical Risk Model Based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Early screening and intervention for osteoporosis (OP), a common bone disease, are of great significance in reducing its incidence and improving the quality of life of patients. This study aimed to build a simple osteoporosis risk model that will provide a scientific basis for clinical decision-making. Study Design: A cross-sectional clinical study. Materials and Methods: We collected relevant data from the 2013-2014 and 2017-2020 cycles of the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and extracted five predictor variables: gender, age, race, body mass index, and history of fractures. The data were processed, organized, and used to build prediction models. Discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility were used to evaluate the model performance. Results: A total of 5732 participants (3520 in the development cohort and 2212 in the validation cohort) were included in the final analysis. A simplified osteoporosis risk model was established based on gender, age, race, body mass index, and history of fractures. The model achieved good discrimination, calibration, and clinical applicability in both the development and validation cohorts. Conclusion: The osteoporosis risk model established in this study was simple, accurate, efficient, and had an important clinical application value for the early detection of osteoporosis. This allows for timely and effective intervention measures to be implemented, reduce the risk of fractures, and improve patients' quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.