Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41395596›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2025

Isoform-specific vs. pan-histone deacetylase inhibition as approaches for countering glioblastoma: an

Ameya Joshi, Natasha Ratnapradipa, Jayce Hughes, Erik Moore, Andrew Ekpenyong, Surabhi Shukla

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ameya JoshiPharmacy Sciences Department, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
Natasha RatnapradipaPhysics Department, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
Jayce HughesPhysics Department, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
Erik MoorePharmacy Sciences Department, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
Andrew EkpenyongPhysics Department, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.
Surabhi ShuklaPharmacy Sciences Department, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University, Omaha, NE, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Glioblastoma (GBM) is a grade 4 brain tumor that originates in astrocytes. GBM has a high death rate and a very low median patient survival rate of 14-16 months, even with well-established treatment regimens. The majority of preclinical models assess the effectiveness of molecular leads on two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures, which may provide insight into toxicity against particular genotypes of GBM but do not provide insight into the mechanism of action of the therapeutic drug. Three-dimensional (3D) cultures present an attractive alternative due to their ability to closely model in vivo tumor-like conditions. Methods: In the present study, we used a rotary cell culture technique to culture 3D cancer spheroids of the T98G cell line. Initially, we estimated the relative potency of histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, which are molecular leads currently in clinical trials as epigenetic therapy for GBM, on 2D and 3D cultures of T98G. We characterized the effect of the 3D half-maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50) on spheroids using a live-dead assay to figure out which inhibitors inhibited cell viability in 3D the most. Finally, we checked the effects of the non-specific and specific inhibitors on tumor migration dynamics using an electric cell impedance sensing (ECIS) device with the help of two parameters-rate of migration (ROM) and late resistance (LR). Results and discussion: Our results show that the specific HDAC-6 inhibitor Tubacin had a more potent anti-proliferative effect in both the cytotoxicity and live-dead assays. The non-specific inhibitor Vorinostat surprisingly promoted migration in the cells at its 2D IC50 value treatment, and none of the inhibitors was able to significantly decrease late resistance compared to untreated controls, indicating the need for the development of more potent HDAC inhibitors for monotherapy for GBM.

Indexed as

glioblastomaHDAC inhibitorstemozolomideTrichostatin-ATubacinVorinostat

Identifiers

PMID41395596
PMCPMC12695619

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.