ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025
Voices from the field: healthcare professionals' insights on sustaining telemedicine for diabetes management in Hong Kong primary care.
Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05183685 (Outcomes of a Risk Assessment and Management Program Using Telecare Consultation Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in General Out-patient Clinic), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Outcomes of a Risk Assessment and Management Program Using Telecare Consultation Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in General Out-patient Clinic: A Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Study
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of large language model-generated information in diabetes health patient education: a scoping review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is a prevalent chronic illness that imposes substantial health and financial burdens. In routine follow-up for diabetes, telemedicine offers a promising alternative to traditional face-to-face care within primary care settings, yet real-world adoption remains uneven and often discontinuous. This study explored how healthcare professionals experience the implementation of telemedicine consultations for diabetes management, identifying facilitators, barriers, and resources needed for long-term operation. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study with 21 healthcare professionals involved in a hybrid telemedicine program in public primary care. Semi-structured interviews underwent a three-stage analysis: first, inductive thematic coding; second, organization of themes using the NASSS framework (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, Sustainability); and third, ecological mapping of each NASSS-organized theme to micro, meso, exo, macro, and chrono levels to trace cross-level pathways and temporal shifts. Results: Thirteen themes were identified and grouped across ecological levels and NASSS domains. Key facilitators included coordinated policy and organizational support, prepared clinic infrastructure, effective training and IT support, and positive perceptions among staff and caregivers. Major barriers included staffing constraints and workflow burden, patient digital literacy challenges and environmental constraints, process complexity including identity verification and e-payment steps, limited suitability for unstable clinical presentations, and gaps in end-to-end service features such as medication delivery. Discussion: Sustaining telemedicine in primary care will require addressing these barriers while reinforcing enabling conditions through aligned policy and financing, streamlined infrastructure and workflows, targeted patient and staff supports, and continued adaptation over time. The combined NASSS and ecological approach clarifies what the determinants are and where and how they operate, offering level-specific, actionable directions to strengthen the long-term delivery of diabetes care via telemedicine. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05183685, identifier NCT05183685.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.