Evidence mapPaperPMID 41395628Full record

ArticleFrontiers in digital health2025

Voices from the field: healthcare professionals' insights on sustaining telemedicine for diabetes management in Hong Kong primary care.

Arkers Kwan Ching Wong, Luna Ziqi Liu, Frances Kam Yuet Wong, Jun Liang, Danny Wah Kun Tong, Man Li Chan, Man Kin Wong, Bo Chu Wong, Cecilia Yeuk Sze Tang, Wai Hing Ho and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in digital health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05183685 (Outcomes of a Risk Assessment and Management Program Using Telecare Consultation Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in General Out-patient Clinic), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05183685 nacompletednot on this map

Outcomes of a Risk Assessment and Management Program Using Telecare Consultation Among Patients With Diabetes Mellitus in General Out-patient Clinic: A Hybrid Effectiveness-implementation Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2022 to 2025Enrolled780ConditionsDiabetes MellitusArmstelecare consultation, Usual face to face consultation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Arkers Kwan Ching WongSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Luna Ziqi LiuSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Frances Kam Yuet WongSchool of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Jun LiangHospital Authority, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Danny Wah Kun TongHospital Authority, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Man Li ChanHospital Authority, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Man Kin WongHospital Authority, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Bo Chu WongHospital Authority, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Cecilia Yeuk Sze TangHospital Authority, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Wai Hing HoHospital Authority, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Sau Ching ChiangHospital Authority, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Diabetes mellitus is a prevalent chronic illness that imposes substantial health and financial burdens. In routine follow-up for diabetes, telemedicine offers a promising alternative to traditional face-to-face care within primary care settings, yet real-world adoption remains uneven and often discontinuous. This study explored how healthcare professionals experience the implementation of telemedicine consultations for diabetes management, identifying facilitators, barriers, and resources needed for long-term operation. Methods: We conducted a qualitative study with 21 healthcare professionals involved in a hybrid telemedicine program in public primary care. Semi-structured interviews underwent a three-stage analysis: first, inductive thematic coding; second, organization of themes using the NASSS framework (Non-Adoption, Abandonment, Scale-Up, Spread, Sustainability); and third, ecological mapping of each NASSS-organized theme to micro, meso, exo, macro, and chrono levels to trace cross-level pathways and temporal shifts. Results: Thirteen themes were identified and grouped across ecological levels and NASSS domains. Key facilitators included coordinated policy and organizational support, prepared clinic infrastructure, effective training and IT support, and positive perceptions among staff and caregivers. Major barriers included staffing constraints and workflow burden, patient digital literacy challenges and environmental constraints, process complexity including identity verification and e-payment steps, limited suitability for unstable clinical presentations, and gaps in end-to-end service features such as medication delivery. Discussion: Sustaining telemedicine in primary care will require addressing these barriers while reinforcing enabling conditions through aligned policy and financing, streamlined infrastructure and workflows, targeted patient and staff supports, and continued adaptation over time. The combined NASSS and ecological approach clarifies what the determinants are and where and how they operate, offering level-specific, actionable directions to strengthen the long-term delivery of diabetes care via telemedicine. Clinical Trial Registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05183685, identifier NCT05183685.

Indexed as

diabetes mellitusecological modelimplementation scienceNASSS frameworkprimary healthcaretelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID41395628
PMCPMC12698631

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.