ReviewPediatric radiology2026
Pediatric vertebral tumors: radiologic features and differential diagnoses.
Review in Pediatric radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pediatric chordoma - the importance of recognizing the poorly differentiated subtype: Reply to Inarejos et al.Pediatric radiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary vertebral tumors in children are rare but clinically significant due to their potential for neurological compromise, spinal instability, and growth-related deformities. These lesions encompass a wide histologic spectrum, ranging from benign entities, such as osteoid osteoma and osteoblastoma, to aggressive malignancies like Ewing sarcoma and osteosarcoma. Despite their rarity, timely and accurate diagnosis is essential, as delays can result in irreversible neurological deficits. Imaging is fundamental across the clinical continuum, from detection and characterization to treatment planning and post-therapeutic monitoring. Conventional radiography remains a common first-line tool, although limited in sensitivity for early or subtle findings. Computed tomography (CT) is particularly useful for evaluating cortical integrity and detecting tumor mineralization, findings that are especially relevant in lesions such as osteoid osteoma, where CT also plays a key role in planning and guiding percutaneous treatment. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the modality of choice, offers superior soft tissue contrast and is essential for assessing bone marrow involvement and adjacent neural structures. Advanced MRI techniques, such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and dynamic contrast-enhanced studies, further enhance lesion characterization and may help predict response to treatment. Minimally invasive techniques, including image-guided biopsy, radiofrequency ablation, and cryoablation, have expanded the therapeutic techniques, particularly for benign lesions. This review provides a comprehensive overview of the classification and imaging features of pediatric spinal bone tumors, with emphasis on the strengths and limitations of each modality and the evolving role of interventional radiology in diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41396196What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.