Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41396309›Full record

ReviewPathologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2026

[Artificial intelligence in diagnostics-a pathology perspective].

Stefan Schulz, Moritz Jesinghaus, Sebastian Foersch

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefan SchulzInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland.
Moritz JesinghausInstitut für Pathologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg und Universitätsklinikum Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.
Sebastian FoerschInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland. sebastian.foersch@unimedizin-mainz.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The increasing complexity and individualization of oncologic diagnostics and therapy present new challenges for pathology. At the same time, artificial intelligence (AI) is evolving from a futuristic concept into a core area of digital medicine. With the availability of digital whole-slide images (WSIs) and increasingly powerful deep learning architectures, the number of publications in digital pathology has risen almost exponentially since around 2019.At the algorithmic level, numerous innovations have emerged in recent years: convolutional neural networks (CNNs), which initially dominated the field, are increasingly being replaced by Vision Transformer (ViT)-based models. Since 2023, foundation models have gained rapid importance due to their broad applicability and generalizability.Proof-of-concept studies have repeatedly demonstrated that AI-based solutions can improve the efficiency and sensitivity of diagnostic workflows. Several AI algorithms for histopathology have already been approved by U.S. and European regulatory agencies. More recent developments, such as vision-language models (VLMs), enable the multimodal integration of text and image data, opening up new interactive possibilities in diagnostics.Overall, the field is at the transition from proof-of-concept studies toward clinical implementation. In particular, foundation models have the potential to fundamentally reshape the structure of histopathological diagnostics in the near future. However, technical, legal, and socio-psychological barriers must still be overcome before widespread clinical adoption can be achieved.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligencePathologyAlgorithmsDeep LearningHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeoplasmsNeural Networks, ComputerArtificial intelligence in pathologyDecision supportDiagnostic artificial intelligence biomarkersDigital pathologyDigital transformationMultimodal data integrationPattern recognition

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.