Trial reportChinese journal of integrative medicine2026
Transcutaneous Electrical Acupoint Stimulation Reduces Postoperative Abdominal Pain after Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection: A Single-Center, Prospective, and Randomized Controlled Trial.
Trial report in Chinese journal of integrative medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of perioperative transcutaneous electrical acupoint stimulation (TEAS) for reducing postoperative abdominal pain in patients after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for early gastric and esophageal neoplasms.
methodsA total of 129 patients undergoing ESD were assigned randomly to the TEAS group (64 cases) or the sham group (65 cases) using computer-generated random numbers and stratified by the surgical type (i.e., gastric or esophageal ESD). Patients in the TEAS group were treated bilaterally at the acupoints Hegu (LI 4), Neiguan (PC 6), Zusanli (ST 36), and Shangjuxu (ST 37), with the stimulation current frequency 2/100 Hz and intensity to the patient's maximum tolerance level. Patients in the sham group were treated at sham acupoints, and no electrical stimulation was given from the HANS stimulator. The TEAS and sham stimulations are both given from 30 min before ESD to the end of surgery. The primary outcome was the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain within 24 h. Secondary outcomes included the area under the curve (AUC) of Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain score from 1 to 48 h, morphine consumption after ESD, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).
resultsThe incidence of moderate-to-severe pain within 24 h postoperative period was significantly decreased by TEAS [22 (37.9%) vs. 40 (64.5%), P=0.004]. Patients needing morphine were also reduced by TEAS treatment [19 (32.7%) vs. 40 (64.5%), P<0.01]. TEAS significantly decreased the proportion and incidence of PONV compared with the sham group (P=0.06). Intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, recovery of gastrointestinal function, postoperative adverse events were similar between the two groups. According to the results of multivariate logistic regression, TEAS treatment was a protective factor associated with reduced incidence of NRS scores ⩾4 (OR=0.227; 95% CI: 0.100 to 0.512; P<0.01), whereas patients undergoing gastric ESD had a much lower incidence of NRS scores ⩾ 4 than esophageal ESD (OR=0.287; 95% CI: 0.133 to 0.621; P=0.002).
conclusionsTEAS can effectively reduce the incidence of moderate-to-severe pain in patients after ESD. TEAS demonstrates an morphine-sparing effect and reduces the occurrence of PONV. (Registration No. ChiCTR2100052837).
Indexed as
Identifiers
41396394What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.