Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41396606›Full record

Trial reportJAMA network open2025

Multidisciplinary Team Support for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yiyan Pei, Jingjing Wang, Juejin Li, Ye Chen, Jinlan He, Zhigong Wei, Zheran Liu, Yonglin Su, Tingting Dai, Li Yin and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05828004 (Effect of Multidisciplinary Team Support on Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05828004 nacompletednot on this map

Effect of Multidisciplinary Team Support on Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy: The SHINE-MDT Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorWest China HospitalRan2023 to 2024Enrolled233ConditionsHead and Neck Carcinoma, Radiotherapy Side EffectsArmsWhole-Course Multidisciplinary Care Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Yiyan PeiDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jingjing WangDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Juejin LiDepartment of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ye ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jinlan HeDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zhigong WeiDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zheran LiuDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yonglin SuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Tingting DaiDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Li YinMental Health Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yaotiao DengDepartment of Head and Neck Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jitao ZhouDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Hangrui TianDepartment of Stomatology, West China School of Public Health and West China Fourth Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yunhuan LiDepartment of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaoli ChenDepartment of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Shu ZhangDepartment of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Yang ChenDepartment of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qianwen YanDepartment of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Ruidan LiDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Zheng JiangDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiaolin HuDepartment of Nursing, West China Hospital, Sichuan University/West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xingchen PengDepartment of Biotherapy, Cancer Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Guidelines recommend nutritional, psychological, and rehabilitation support for patients with head and neck cancer during radiotherapy, but many patients, particularly in China, lack efficient access to such services. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of Supportive Holistic Interventions by Nurses and Experts via Multidisciplinary Team (SHINE-MDT), a framework to coordinate nutritional, psychological, and rehabilitation support, at reducing radiotherapy interruptions, improving nutritional status, alleviating psychological burdens, and enhancing the quality of life (QOL) among patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial (RCT) of SHINE-MDT vs usual care (UC) was conducted at West China Hospital from April 27 to December 1, 2023. Adult patients aged 18 years or older with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy were enrolled. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either UC or SHINE-MDT. The SHINE-MDT group received nutritional, psychological, and rehabilitation support delivered by a team including oncology nurse specialists, radiation and medical oncologists, dietitians, psychotherapists, and rehabilitation physicians. The UC group received supportive measures aligned with standard practice. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the radiotherapy interruption rate in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported QOL assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Nutritional status was evaluated using Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and psychological status using a distress thermometer (DT), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Assessments from baseline through 6 months posttreatment were analyzed using mixed-effects models for intergroup comparisons. Results: A total of 233 patients were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 51.7 [13.9] years; mean [SD] body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], 23.8 [3.3]; 158 males [67.8%]). The radiotherapy interruption rate in the SHINE-MDT group was 13.9 (95% CI, 4.2-23.6) percentage points lower than that in the UC group (11.1% [95% CI, 6.0%-18.2%] vs 25.0% [95% CI, 17.2%-34.2%]; P = .003). The SHINE-MDT group had superior outcomes compared with the UC group at the end of radiotherapy, with better global health status (mean QLQ-C30 score, 68.59 [95% CI, 65.83-71.35] vs 64.06 [95% CI, 61.48-66.64]; P = .009), improved mean psychological status scores (DT: 3.02 [95% CI, 2.68-3.35] vs 4.30 [95% CI, 4.00-4.59]; HADS-Anxiety: 4.96 [95% CI, 4.27-5.66] vs 7.27 [95% CI, 6.44-8.12]; HADS-Depression: 4.48 [95% CI, 4.00-4.98] vs 6.06 [95% CI, 5.42-6.70]; PHQ-9: 2.22 [95% CI, 1.73-2.72] vs 3.49 [95% CI, 2.94-4.03]; all P < .001), and better nutritional indicators reflected by lower mean NRS-2002 (2.19 [95% CI, 2.07-2.31] vs 2.80 [95% CI, 2.62-2.96]) and PG-SGA (6.89 [95% CI, 6.17-7.61] vs 10.19 [95% CI, 9.27-11.11]) (both P < .001) scores. Conclusions and Relevance: In this RCT, the SHINE-MDT intervention reduced radiotherapy interruptions, improved nutritional status, alleviated psychological burdens, and elevated QOL, indicating this framework may improve the holistic well-being of patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05828004.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsPatient Care TeamAdultAgedChinaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNutritional StatusQuality of Life

Identifiers

PMID41396606
PMCPMC12706684

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.