Trial reportJAMA network open2025
Multidisciplinary Team Support for Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Receiving Radiotherapy: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05828004 (Effect of Multidisciplinary Team Support on Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Effect of Multidisciplinary Team Support on Head and Neck Cancer Patients Receiving Radiotherapy: The SHINE-MDT Randomized Controlled Trial
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary mHealth Rehabilitation for Patients With Abdominal Cancer Who Are Receiving Chemoradiotherapy: Randomized Phase II Trial.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Trial
- Lifestyle Interventions During Radiotherapy: A Scoping Review of Their Effects on Toxicity and Patient-Centered Outcomes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Maternal sleep deprivation and developmental programming of brain aging trajectories in offspring.Biogerontology · 2026Review
- Precision management of radiotherapy interruption in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Induction chemotherapy counteracts the survival impact in high-risk patients defined by a novel model.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Patient Satisfaction and Supportive Care Pathways in a German Head and Neck Tumor Center: A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of four nutritional scores in predicting hospital stay duration for EICU Patients with acute pancreatitis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Mapping the Patient Journey of Oral Microbiota Transplantation During Radiotherapy: A Qualitative Study.Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
22 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Guidelines recommend nutritional, psychological, and rehabilitation support for patients with head and neck cancer during radiotherapy, but many patients, particularly in China, lack efficient access to such services. Objective: To assess the effectiveness of Supportive Holistic Interventions by Nurses and Experts via Multidisciplinary Team (SHINE-MDT), a framework to coordinate nutritional, psychological, and rehabilitation support, at reducing radiotherapy interruptions, improving nutritional status, alleviating psychological burdens, and enhancing the quality of life (QOL) among patients with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: A randomized clinical trial (RCT) of SHINE-MDT vs usual care (UC) was conducted at West China Hospital from April 27 to December 1, 2023. Adult patients aged 18 years or older with head and neck cancer undergoing radiotherapy were enrolled. Interventions: Eligible patients were randomly allocated (1:1) to either UC or SHINE-MDT. The SHINE-MDT group received nutritional, psychological, and rehabilitation support delivered by a team including oncology nurse specialists, radiation and medical oncologists, dietitians, psychotherapists, and rehabilitation physicians. The UC group received supportive measures aligned with standard practice. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the radiotherapy interruption rate in the intent-to-treat population. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported QOL assessed using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QOL Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30). Nutritional status was evaluated using Nutrition Risk Screening 2002 (NRS-2002) and the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) and psychological status using a distress thermometer (DT), the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Assessments from baseline through 6 months posttreatment were analyzed using mixed-effects models for intergroup comparisons. Results: A total of 233 patients were enrolled (mean [SD] age, 51.7 [13.9] years; mean [SD] body mass index [calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared], 23.8 [3.3]; 158 males [67.8%]). The radiotherapy interruption rate in the SHINE-MDT group was 13.9 (95% CI, 4.2-23.6) percentage points lower than that in the UC group (11.1% [95% CI, 6.0%-18.2%] vs 25.0% [95% CI, 17.2%-34.2%]; P = .003). The SHINE-MDT group had superior outcomes compared with the UC group at the end of radiotherapy, with better global health status (mean QLQ-C30 score, 68.59 [95% CI, 65.83-71.35] vs 64.06 [95% CI, 61.48-66.64]; P = .009), improved mean psychological status scores (DT: 3.02 [95% CI, 2.68-3.35] vs 4.30 [95% CI, 4.00-4.59]; HADS-Anxiety: 4.96 [95% CI, 4.27-5.66] vs 7.27 [95% CI, 6.44-8.12]; HADS-Depression: 4.48 [95% CI, 4.00-4.98] vs 6.06 [95% CI, 5.42-6.70]; PHQ-9: 2.22 [95% CI, 1.73-2.72] vs 3.49 [95% CI, 2.94-4.03]; all P < .001), and better nutritional indicators reflected by lower mean NRS-2002 (2.19 [95% CI, 2.07-2.31] vs 2.80 [95% CI, 2.62-2.96]) and PG-SGA (6.89 [95% CI, 6.17-7.61] vs 10.19 [95% CI, 9.27-11.11]) (both P < .001) scores. Conclusions and Relevance: In this RCT, the SHINE-MDT intervention reduced radiotherapy interruptions, improved nutritional status, alleviated psychological burdens, and elevated QOL, indicating this framework may improve the holistic well-being of patients with head and neck cancer receiving radiotherapy. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05828004.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.