ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2025
Multimodal Data-Driven Explainable Prognostic Model for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events Prediction in Patients With Unstable Angina and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: Multicenter, Cross-Regional Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phenotypic Heterogeneity of Obesity and Short-Term Cardiometabolic Risk Factors Transitions: A Population-Based Cohort Study.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2026Article
- Crossover effect: causal machine learning reveals opposing mortality responses to mean arterial pressure targets among phenotypically distinct hypertensive patients with septic shock.Internal medicine journal · 2026Article
- Associations of the CHG index combined with obesity indicators with cardiovascular disease in early CKM syndrome using CHARLS data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The combined effect of arterial hypertension and coronary microvascular dysfunction in the prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a real-world study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2026Article
- Development and Validation of a Prognostic Nomogram for Post-Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Heart Failure Hospitalization in Patients With Concurrent Symptomatic Aortic Stenosis and Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Multicenter Study.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Article
- Multicenter development and validation of machine-learning risk models to predict procedural complete revascularization and in-hospital heart failure in STEMI patients treated with primary PCI.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Risk prediction for long-term cardiovascular events in patients with concurrent hypertension, HFpEF, and unstable angina: a multicenter machine learning-assisted cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Construction of a predictive model for the efficacy of enhanced external counterpulsation therapy in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction based on automated machine learning and echocardiography.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Article
- Multiple machine-learning-driven metabolic frameworks for long-term prognostic risk assessment in patients with coexisting hypertension and obstructive sleep apnea:insights from a multicenter cohort study.Frontiers in physiology · 2026Article
- Predicting short-term composite outcome risk in heart failure patients using a machine learning model incorporating UHR: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and unstable angina (UA) often coexist in clinical practice, constituting a high-risk cardiovascular phenotype with a markedly increased incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs). The identification of high-risk patients within this population is crucial for reducing complications, improving outcomes, and guiding clinical decision-making. Objective: This study aimed to develop and externally validate predictive models based on machine learning algorithms to estimate the risk of MACEs in patients with coexisting UA and HFpEF, and to construct an online risk calculator to support individualized prevention strategies. Methods: This multicenter cohort study included 4459 patients with both HFpEF and UA admitted to 7 hospitals across eastern, central, and western China between January 1, 2015, and December 31, 2021. Patients were divided into the derivation cohort (n=2923) and external validation cohort (n=1536) based on geographic regions. Clinical, laboratory, and imaging data were extracted from electronic medical records. Key predictors were identified using a hybrid feature selection method combining least absolute shrinkage and selection operator and Boruta algorithms. A total of 33 survival models were developed, including a variety of machine learning algorithms and survival analysis models. The model with the best concordance index (C-index) performance was deployed as a web-based risk calculator. Additionally, we assessed other performance indicators of the best-performing model, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, recall, F1-score, Brier scores, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis. Results: Using a combination of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression and the Boruta algorithm, 7 key predictors were identified: diabetes mellitus, blood platelet count, triglyceride, systemic inflammatory response index, triglyceride-glucose-BMI, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide, and atherogenic index of plasma. The surv.xgboost.cox model was used to predict MACEs in patients with UA and HFpEF due to its superior C-index. The model demonstrated the following performance metrics in the external validation cohort: a C-index of 0.788; cumulative/dynamic area under the curve of 0.81; and area under the curve values at 20, 30, and 40 months of 0.809 (95% CI 0.745-0.873), 0.784 (95% CI 0.745-0.824), and 0.807 (95% CI 0.776-0.838), respectively. The model exhibited satisfactory calibration and clinical utility in predicting 40-month MACEs. Model interpretability was enhanced using Shapley Additive Explanations for survival analysis to provide global and individual explanations. Furthermore, we converted the surv.xgboost.cox-based model into a publicly available tool for predicting 40-month MACEs, providing estimated probabilities based on the predictive indicators entered. Conclusions: We developed a surv.xgboost.cox-based predictive model for MACEs in patients with the dual phenotype of HFpEF and UA. We implemented this model as a web-based calculator to facilitate clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.