Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41397750›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on cognitive function and upper limb motor function in people with chronic stroke: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Nga Huen Chan, Shamay S M Ng

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05615610 (A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Cognitive Function and Upper Limb Motor Function in People With Chronic Stroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05615610 narecruitingnot on this map

A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Cognitive Function and Upper Limb Motor Function in People With Chronic Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityRan2023 to 2025Enrolled90ConditionsChronic StrokeArmstSCS, tVNS, Control
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Nga Huen ChanDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8466-8125
Shamay S M NgDepartment of Rehabilitation Sciences, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China Shamay.Ng@polyu.edu.hk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1660-0548

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCognitive impairment and upper limb impairment are common complications following stroke, but rehabilitation interventions targeting post-stroke cognitive and upper limb motor deficits remain understudied. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation, including transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) and transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (tSCS), can potentially alleviate cognitive impairment and promote motor recovery. Although tVNS and tSCS may facilitate neuroplasticity following stroke, their effects on cognitive and upper limb motor outcomes have not been sufficiently studied. Therefore, the proposed clinical trial will investigate the effects of tVNS and tSCS on cognitive function and upper limb motor function in people with chronic stroke. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A three-arm sham-controlled single-blind parallel-group randomised controlled trial will be performed with people with chronic stroke. All participants (n=90) will be randomly allocated to receive 18 sessions of intervention with different stimulation protocols (tVNS, tSCS and sham stimulation) at a 1:1:1 ratio. All participants will receive upper limb exercises concurrent with the corresponding stimulation protocols for 45 min in each session, three sessions per week, for 6 weeks. The primary outcomes will be the Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity. The secondary outcomes will be the Rivermead Behavioural Memory Test, Digit Span Test, Trail Making Test, Wolf Motor Function Test, maximum isometric voluntary contraction of the elbow, muscle stiffness of the elbow extensor and flexor, Arm Activity Measure, Oxford Participation and Activity Questionnaire and 12-item Short-Form Survey. All outcomes will be assessed at baseline, after 9 and 18 sessions of the intervention, and 1 month after the cessation of the intervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval has been obtained from the Human Subjects Ethics Committee of The Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HSEARS20221011002). The results yielded from this study will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals and at international conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05615610.

Indexed as

CognitionCognitive DysfunctionStrokeStroke RehabilitationTranscutaneous Electric Nerve StimulationUpper ExtremityAdultAgedChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRecovery of FunctionSingle-Blind MethodCognitionElectric Stimulation TherapyRandomized Controlled TrialStroke

Identifiers

PMID41397750
PMCPMC12706246

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.