Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41398198›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Photogrammetry-based smartphone applications for spinal posture assessment: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Mina Karbalaeimahdi, Hooman Minoonejad, Seyed Hamed Mousavi, Reza Rajabi

Registry-linked trialAbstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07588061 (Comparative Effect of Maitland Mobilization Combined With Kendall Exercises on Pain and Postural Alignment in Adults With Upper Cross Syndrome), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07588061 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Comparative Effect of Maitland Mobilization Combined With Kendall Exercises on Pain and Postural Alignment in Adults With Upper Cross Syndrome

TypeinterventionalSponsorIbadat International University, IslamabadRan2026 to 2026Enrolled58ConditionsUpper Cross SyndromeArmsKendall Exercises combined Maitland Mobilization, Kendall Exercise alone
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mina KarbalaeimahdiDepartment of Sport Injuries and Biomechanics, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5721-8495
Hooman MinoonejadDepartment of Sport Injuries and Biomechanics, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5983-8102
Seyed Hamed MousaviDepartment of Sport Injuries and Biomechanics, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. musavihamed@ut.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2906-2101
Reza RajabiDepartment of Sport Injuries and Biomechanics, Faculty of Sport Sciences and Health, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran. rrajabi@ut.ac.ir.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0464-5688

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smartphones have become essential tools in healthcare, particularly in assessing human posture. This systematic review evaluated mobile applications that utilize photogrammetry to assess body alignment in both the sagittal and coronal planes. The review adhered to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024573433). We conducted a search across multiple databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, ACM Digital Library, Embase, and Google Scholar. Studies were included if they reported the development, testing, or validation of smartphone apps for posture analysis. Excluded were studies that used wearables, radiographic or sensor-based methods, or those without full-text availability. Two authors independently screened the studies and extracted relevant data. The COSMIN checklist was employed to assess the quality of the studies. A meta-analysis using MedCalc calculated the intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) and Pearson's r for assessing reliability and validity. A total of 29 studies involving 1,910 participants were included in the review. The pooled ICCs demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.904) and inter-rater reliability (ICC = 0.889) for the craniovertebral angle, while measurements for hip tilt, head tilt, and acromion alignment showed moderate to excellent reliability. Limitations of this review include the restriction to English-language studies, heterogeneity in methods, small sample sizes, and inconsistent reporting (e.g., SEM, MAD). These findings support the clinical utility of smartphone applications for posture assessment.

Indexed as

Mobile ApplicationsPhotogrammetryPostureSmartphoneSpineHumansReproducibility of ResultsMHealthPostural assessmentSmartphone applicationsSpine

Identifiers

PMID41398198
PMCPMC12827935

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.